You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 10, May 27, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy

Clinical Presentation, Results of Lung Scanning, and Subsequent Maternal and Pediatric Outcomes

W. S. Chan, MD, FRCPC; J. G. Ray, MD, FRCPC; S. Murray, MD, FRCPC; G. E. Coady, MRT(N); G. Coates, MD, FRCPC; J. S. Ginsberg, MD, FRCPC

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1170-1175.

Background  Ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scanning is used when pulmonary embolism (PE) is suspected during pregnancy; however, the distribution of lung scan results and safety of VQ scanning have never been studied.

Objective  To study the distribution of lung scan results and safety of VQ scanning as well as the safety of withholding anticoagulation therapy following a normal or nondiagnostic scan in pregnant women.

Methods  The study group comprised 120 consecutive pregnant women who presented with suspected PE. Clinical data were collected, and the lung scans were reinterpreted by 2 independent experts. Subsequent pregnancy and pediatric outcomes were determined by direct patient follow-up.

Results  During the study period, 120 pregnant women (mean age, 32 years) underwent 121 VQ scans. Eight cases (6.6%) were already receiving treatment for venous thromboembolism prior to VQ scanning. In the remaining 113 scans, 83 (73.5%) were interpreted as normal, 28 (24.8%) as nondiagnostic, and 2 (1.8%) as high probability. In the 104 women who did not receive anticoagulation therapy following lung scanning (80 normal and 24 nondiagnostic), no venous thromboembolic events were reported (mean [range] length of follow-up, 20.6 [0.5-108] months). Examination of pediatric data from 110 live births (90.2%) (mean [range] age, 20.5 [0.5-100] months) revealed no increase in the rates of congenital and developmental anomalies.

Conclusions  The prevalence of high-probability VQ scans in pregnant women with suspected PE and probable PE is very low. Withholding anticoagulation in pregnant women with normal or nondiagnostic VQ scans is probably safe. In addition, pediatric risks from VQ scans are low. Large prospective studies are needed to evaluate diagnostic strategies for pregnant women with suspected PE.


From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Chan and Ray) and Radiology (Dr Murray and Mr Coady), Women's College Campus, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Ray); and the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (Dr Coates) and Medicine (Dr Ginsberg), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Venous thromoboembolic disease and pregnancy
Martineau and Nelson-Piercy
Postgrad. Med. J. 2009;85:489-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:2276-2315.
FULL TEXT  

Perfusion Scintigraphy Still has Important Role in Evaluation of Majority of Pregnant Patients with Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism
Scarsbrook et al.
Radiology 2007;244:623-625.
FULL TEXT  

Investigating suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy
Scarsbrook and Gleeson
BMJ 2007;334:418-419.
FULL TEXT  

Critical Care of the Obstetric Patient
Shapiro
J Intensive Care Med 2006;21:278-286.
ABSTRACT  

Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol?
Matthews
Br. J. Radiol. 2006;79:441-444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Antithrombotic Agents During Pregnancy: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Bates et al.
Chest 2004;126:627S-644S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Kearon
CMAJ 2003;168:183-194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How we manage venous thromboembolism during pregnancy
Bates and Ginsberg
Blood 2002;100:3470-3478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.