You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 11, June 10, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality of Care for Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure

Assessing the Impact of Hospitalists

Peter K. Lindenauer, MD, MSc; Rona Chehabeddine, MPH; Penelope Pekow, PhD; Janice Fitzgerald, MS, RN; Evan M. Benjamin, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1251-1256.

Background  The quality of care provided to patients hospitalized for heart failure has been shown to vary by physician, hospital, and region. Hospitalists appear to reduce costs and length of stay, yet their impact on quality of care is less certain.

Objective  To compare quality of care and resource utilization among patients with heart failure treated by hospitalists and nonhospitalist general internists.

Methods  We reviewed the medical records of patients with a principal diagnosis of heart failure between April 1, 1999, and March 30, 2000, at a 550-bed community-based teaching hospital in Massachusetts. We evaluated quality of care by measuring adherence to a set of commonly used process measures and compared resource utilization using severity-adjusted length of stay and costs.

Results  The analysis included 280 patients, accounting for 326 heart failure admissions: 20 hospitalists cared for 137 (42%) cases, while 65 nonhospitalists cared for 189 (58%). Of 137 hospitalist cases, 129 (94%) had new or prior left ventricular ejection fraction testing results documented during the hospitalization compared with 165 (87%) of 189 nonhospitalist cases (P = .04). In cohorts of ideal candidates, performance rates for hospitalist and nonhospitalist cases were similar for prescriptions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for patients with ejection fractions lower than 40% (97% vs 96%; P>.99) and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation (60% vs 55%; P = .64). Rates of comprehensive discharge counseling was similar in the 2 groups. Multivariable modeling did not substantially alter these findings. After adjusting for differences in severity, patients treated by hospitalists had a shorter length of stay but similar overall costs when compared with those treated by nonhospitalists.

Conclusion  Compared with nonhospitalists, hospitalists were more likely to document assessment of left ventricular function and their patients had a shorter length of stay.


From the Division of Healthcare Quality, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass (Drs Lindenauer, Pekow, and Benjamin and Ms Fitzgerald), the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (Ms Chehabeddine and Dr Pekow), and the Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (Drs Lindenauer and Benjamin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(11):1315-1316.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hospitalists and the Quality of Care in Hospitals
Lopez et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1389-1394.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Quality Measures in Adult Patients Cared for by Hospitalists vs Nonhospitalists
Peterson
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:248-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Care by Hospitalists, General Internists, and Family Physicians
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;357:2589-2600.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Les implications du phenomene des medecins hospitaliers
Lehmann et al.
cfp 2007;53:2131-2131.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospitalist Care and Length of Stay in Patients Requiring Complex Discharge Planning and Close Clinical Monitoring
Southern et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1869-1874.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Hospitalists: Report of a Leadership Conference
Lye et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1122-1130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Alternative Approach to Reducing the Costs of Patient Care? A Controlled Trial of the Multi-Disciplinary Doctor-Nurse Practitioner (MDNP) Model
Ettner et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:9-17.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact of Hospitalists on the Cost and Quality of Inpatient Care in the United States: A Research Synthesis
Coffman and Rundall
Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:379-406.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact of Hospitalists on Congestive Heart Failure
Terplan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2633-2634.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.