You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 14, July 22, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Early Intervention in Planning End-of-Life Care With Ambulatory Geriatric Patients

Results of a Pilot Trial

Carolyn E. Schwartz, ScD; H. Brownell Wheeler, MD; Bernard Hammes, PhD; Noreen Basque, RN, MA; Jean Edmunds, MA; George Reed, PhD; Yunsheng Ma, MPH; Lynn Li, MD; Patricia Tabloski, PhD, RN; Julianne Yanko, PhD; and the UMass End-of-Life Working Group

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1611-1618.

Background  A large discrepancy exists between the wishes of dying patients and their actual end-of-life care. However, retrospective clinical experience suggests that early advance care planning (ACP) can markedly reduce this discrepancy. This article describes a randomized trial to evaluate the short-term clinical utility of early ACP. We also assessed the feasibility of performing a larger prospective study to document long-term outcomes.

Methods  Ambulatory geriatric patients (N = 61) were randomized to either a control group, which received only a Massachusetts Health Care Proxy form to complete, or an intervention group, in which each patient and health care agent discussed ACP with a trained nurse facilitator. The benefits and burdens of life-sustaining treatments were discussed, and patient goals and preferences for these treatments were documented.

Results  Two-month follow-up revealed that the intervention achieved higher congruence between agents and patients in their understanding of patients' end-of-life care preferences, with 76% (19/25) in complete agreement vs 55% (12/22) of the controls (effect size [ES] = -0.43). There was also a greater increase in patient knowledge about ACP in the intervention group (ES = 0.22). Intervention patients became less willing to undergo life-sustaining treatments for a new serious medical problem (ES = -0.25), more willing to undergo such treatments for an incurable progressive disease (ES = 0.24), and less willing to tolerate poor health states (ES = -0.78). Practical insights were gained about how to conduct a larger study more effectively.

Conclusion  A facilitated discussion about end-of-life care between patients and their health care agents helps define and document the patient's wishes for both patient and agent.


From the Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health (Dr Schwartz) and Surgery (Dr Wheeler), the Office of Medical Ethics (Ms Edmunds), the Department of Medicine, Divisions of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine (Drs Schwartz, Reed, and Yanko and Mr Ma) and General Medicine, Primary Care, and Geriatrics (Dr Li), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; the Department of Medical Humanities, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation, La Crosse, Wis (Dr Hammes); Visiting Nurse Association Care Network Inc, Worcester (Ms Basque); and Boston College School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Mass (Dr Tabloski). Members of the UMass End-of-Life Working Group (Worcester, Mass) are Eileen Griffin, RN; Thomas G. Landry III, DMin; Flo Leclair, RN, BSN, CNRH; Sarah McGee, MD, MPH; Sarah Reiff-Hekking, PhD; and Joanne Spurr, LCSW.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evidence for Improving Palliative Care at the End of Life: A Systematic Review
Lorenz et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:147-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Completion of a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care: What Does Cognition Have to Do With It?
McGuire et al.
Gerontologist 2007;47:457-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controlling Death: The False Promise of Advance Directives
Perkins
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:51-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Three Methods of Assessing Values for Advance Care Planning: Comparing Persons With and Without Dementia
Karel et al.
J Aging Health 2007;19:123-151.
ABSTRACT  

Living wills and the Mental Capacity Act: a postal questionnaire survey of UK geriatricians
Schiff et al.
Age Ageing 2006;35:116-121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Cardiopulmonary Diseases: American College of Chest Physicians Position Statement
Selecky et al.
Chest 2005;128:3599-3610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision making at the end of life: shifting sands
Schwartz
JRSM 2005;98:297-298.
FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life Treatment Preferences of Persons With Serious Mental Illness
Foti et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2005;56:585-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitating Advance Directives
Lo and Steinbrook
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1501-1506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Valuing the Outcomes of Treatment: Do Patients and Their Caregivers Agree?
Fried et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2073-2078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02)
Evid. Based Nurs. 2003;6:e1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.