You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 14, July 22, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (63)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Diagnosis
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Use of a Clinical Decision Rule in Combination With D-Dimer Concentration in Diagnostic Workup of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

A Prospective Management Study

Marieke J. H. A. Kruip, MD; Marjan J. Slob, MD; Joost H. E. M. Schijen, MD; Cees van der Heul, MD; Harry R. Büller, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1631-1635.

Background  We designed a diagnostic strategy, based on clinical probability and D-dimer concentration, to select patients who were unlikely to have pulmonary embolism (PE), before further diagnostic workup was performed. The utility and safety of this strategy were evaluated in a prospective management study.

Methods  Consecutive patients with suspected PE had D-dimer testing and clinical probability assessment with a clinical decision rule. Patients with a low probability and a normal D-dimer concentration (<500 ng/mL) were considered not to have PE, and further diagnostic testing and anticoagulant therapy were withheld. In patients with a low probability and elevated D-dimer level or with a moderate or high probability, bilateral compression ultrasonography of the legs was performed. If deep venous thrombosis was detected, venous thromboembolism was diagnosed. If compression ultrasonography was normal, pulmonary angiography was performed. All patients were followed up for 3 months.

Results  Of the 234 consecutive patients, 26% had the combination of a low probability and normal D-dimer level. During the follow-up period, none of these patients died and 3 patients had recurrent complaints of PE. In these 3 patients, PE was excluded by objective testing. The 3-month thromboembolic risk was therefore 0% (95% confidence interval, 0%-6%). The prevalence of PE in the entire population was 22%.

Conclusions  The combination of a low clinical probability and a normal D-dimer concentration appears to be a safe method to exclude PE, with a high clinical utility, and is readily accepted by clinicians.


From the Departments of Internal Medicine (Drs Kruip and van der Heul), Radiology (Dr Slob), and Pulmonology (Dr Schijen), St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, and Department of Vascular Medicine, Academical Medical Centre, Amsterdam (Dr Büller), the Netherlands.


RELATED LETTERS

D-Dimer Tests for Assessment of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Graham J. Caine and Gregory Y. H. Lip
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(2):243.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Plasma D-Dimer Test Accuracy Can Be Affected by Heparin Administration
James Kelly and Beverley J. Hunt
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(2):247.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

D-Dimer Assay to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Oncologic Population: Correlation with CT Pulmonary Angiography in an Urgent Care Setting
King et al.
Radiology 2008;247:854-861.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography vs Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scanning in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Anderson et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2743-2753.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Algorithm for Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism--Reply
Nijkeuter et al.
JAMA 2006;295:2604-2604.
FULL TEXT  

An algorithm for managing suspected pulmonary embolism.
Takagi and Umemoto
JAMA 2006;295:2603-2604.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review
Hogg et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:172-178.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Investigating pulmonary embolism in the emergency department with lower limb plethysmography: the Manchester Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (MIOPED) study
Hogg et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:94-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outpatient diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: the MIOPED (Manchester Investigation Of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) study
Hogg et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:123-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed Tomography
Writing Group for the Christopher Study Investigat
JAMA 2006;295:172-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Importance of Pretest Probability Score and D-Dimer Assay Before Sonography for Lower Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis
Subramaniam et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;186:206-212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism
Roy et al.
BMJ 2005;331:259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Perrier et al.
NEJM 2005;352:1760-1768.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Usefulness of D-Dimer Depending on Clinical Probability and Cutoff Value in Outpatients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Righini et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2483-2487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anticoagulation Monitoring
Smythe and Caffee
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2004;17:317-326.
ABSTRACT  

Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Schoepf et al.
Circulation 2004;109:2160-2167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Utility of D-dimer in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Nondiagnostic Lung Scans or Negative CT Findings
Rathbun et al.
Chest 2004;125:851-855.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: State of the Art
Schoepf and Costello
Radiology 2004;230:329-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have Pulmonary Embolism?
Chunilal et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2849-2858.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Fedullo and Tapson
NEJM 2003;349:1247-1256.
FULL TEXT  

A Clinical Probability Assessment and D-dimer Measurement Should Be the Initial Step in the Investigation of Suspected Venous Thromboembolism
Kelly and Hunt
Chest 2003;124:1116-1119.
FULL TEXT  

Managing pulmonary embolism
Janata
BMJ 2003;326:1341-1342.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Strategies for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism in Clinical Outcome Studies: A Systematic Review
Kruip et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:941-951.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

D-Dimer Tests for Assessment of Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Caine and Lip
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:243-243.
FULL TEXT  

Potency of Inhaled Corticosteroid Fails to Predict Reduced Emergency Department Visits
Williams
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:247-248.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosing PE: Combining Clinical Probability and D-Dimer Testing
JWatch Emergency Med. 2002;2002:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

A Combined Approach to Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism
Journal Watch Cardiology 2002;2002:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

A Combined Approach to Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism
JWatch General 2002;2002:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.