You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 17, September 23, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Immunization
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pneumococcal Vaccination

Analysis of Opportunities in an Inner-city Hospital

Shahid Husain, MD; David Slobodkin, MD, MPH; Robert A. Weinstein, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1961-1965.

Background  Adult pneumococcal vaccination rates for persons at risk of developing pneumococcal disease remain below desired levels. Various sites within the hospital (inpatient medicine wards [IMWs], general medicine clinics [GMCs], and emergency departments [EDs]) have been suggested as venues for administering vaccination. The cost-effectiveness of such sites for delivery of pneumococcal vaccination is not known.

Objective  To compare the potential coverage of at-risk patients and cost of pneumococcal vaccination delivered in an ED, GMC, and IMWs.

Methods  We studied a retrospective cohort of 300 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia who had been hospitalized at Cook County Hospital, an inner-city Chicago public teaching hospital, from January 1994 through December 1998. We measured the presence of risk factors, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for developing pneumococcal disease prior to index admission for bacteremia; patient use of ED, GMC, and IMWs from 4 weeks to 5 years before index admission; size of target population for vaccination in each site; and cost benefit of a pneumococcal vaccination strategy at each site.

Results  In the 4 weeks to 5 years before index admission, risk factors were present in 209 patients; 182 (87.1%) of the 209 had been in the ED, 104 (49.7%) in an IMW, and 64 (30.6%) in a GMC. The ED showed the greatest potential vaccine coverage, at a cost savings in a best-case scenario; the IMWs showed the best cost-benefit ratio but would provide access to fewer at-risk patients; and a program in the GMC would reach the fewest at-risk patients, with a cost-benefit ratio similar to that of the ED.

Conclusions  The ED in an inner-city hospital has the potential to vaccinate more patients at risk of pneumococcal bacteremia than a GMC or IMWs, and may do so at a cost savings. A prospective evaluation of such a strategy is warranted.


From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Husain); School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago (Dr Slobodkin), and Cook County Hospital and Rush Medical College (Dr Weinstein), Chicago, Ill.


RELATED LETTER

Corrections to Table
Shahid Husain, David Slobodkin, and Robert A. Weinstein
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(5):573.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lessons learned from inpatient vaccination in michigan.
Winston et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:125-133.
ABSTRACT  

Corrections to Table
Husain et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:573-573.
FULL TEXT  

A Vaccine-Preventable Infection -- So What's the Problem?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2002;2002:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.