This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Quality of Care, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Daniel P. Sulmasy, OFM, MD, PhD; Jessica M. McIlvane, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2098-2104.

Objective  To elicit ratings of quality and satisfaction with care from medical inpatients, especially those near the end of life.

Methods  We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 84 seriously ill medical inpatients at 2 academic medical centers. Forty-five had do-not-resuscitate orders. Patients were interviewed using a valid and reliable instrument, the Quality of End-of-Life Care and Satisfaction With Treatment scale (scored from 1.0-5.0) and standard measures of symptoms, anxiety, depression, and delirium.

Results  Mean patient ratings of quality of care were higher regarding physicians than nurses (4.39 vs 4.24; P = .01). Mean patient ratings of satisfaction with physicians were also higher, but not significantly (4.53 vs 4.43; P = .32). In analysis of variance models, patient ratings of physician quality were lowest for patients with do-not-resuscitate orders who were treated by a house-staff service compared with other patients (P = .01). These patients were also least satisfied with their physicians (P = .03). Nondepressed patients with private attending physicians rated nursing quality the highest (P = .16). These patients also reported the highest satisfaction with nurses (P = .002). Quality and satisfaction were not related to severity of illness, and pain was only weakly associated with satisfaction with physicians.

Conclusions  Patients with do-not-resuscitate orders who were treated by a house-staff service gave the lowest ratings of physician quality and satisfaction. Only private patients who were not depressed were highly satisfied with their nursing care. Further study is required to better understand these findings and whether they are amenable to quality improvement.

From the John J. Conley Department of Ethics, St Vincent Catholic Medical Centers, St Vincent's Manhattan, New York, NY (Drs Sulmasy and McIlvane), and the Bioethics Institute of New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (Dr Sulmasy).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Quality and Outcomes of Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Lee et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1938-1945.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing physical functioning: a systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care
Jordhoy et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:673-682.
ABSTRACT  

Patient evaluation of end-of-life care
de Vogel-Voogt et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:243-248.
ABSTRACT  

Qualitative study of Chinese widows in Hong Kong: insights for psycho-social care in hospice settings
Chow et al.
Palliat Med 2006;20:513-520.
ABSTRACT  

Parent and Physician Perspectives on Quality of Care at the End of Life in Children With Cancer
Mack et al.
JCO 2005;23:9155-9161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Admission to intensive care unit at the end-of-life: is it an informed decision?
Rady and Johnson
Palliat Med 2004;18:705-711.
ABSTRACT  

The Influence of the End of Life on the Extent of Informal Help Received by Older Adults
Johnson et al.
Research on Aging 2004;26:259-283.
ABSTRACT