You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 2, January 28, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of Gemfibrozil for Coronary Heart Disease Patients With Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

The Department of Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial

John A. Nyman, PhD; Melissa S. Martinson, PhD; David Nelson, PhD; Sean Nugent, BA; Dorothea Collins, ScD; Janet Wittes, PhD; Carol L. Fye, RPh; Timothy J. Wilt, MD, MPH; Sander J. Robins, MD; Hanna Bloomfield Rubins, MD, MPH; for the VA-HIT Study Group

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:177-182.

Background  Although numerous clinical trials and economic analyses have established the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lowering cholesterol for the prevention of coronary heart disease, there are few data on the role of raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and lowering triglyceride levels. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program HDL-C Intervention Trial (VA-HIT) was a multicenter, randomized trial of gemfibrozil, an agent that raised HDL-C levels and lowered triglyceride levels, yet had no effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The study showed that gemfibrozil therapy significantly reduced major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) in patients with coronary heart disease, low HDL-C levels, and low LDL-C levels.

Objective  To report the results of a cost-effectiveness study based on the results of the VA-HIT.

Methods  The cost per year of life gained with gemfibrozil therapy was calculated. Hazard functions were estimated, and the resulting probabilities were used in a Markov model simulation to estimate the effect of gemfibrozil on life expectancy and costs over a simulated lifetime. Sensitivity analyses were used to account for uncertainty.

Results  Using the prices of gemfibrozil that were negotiated by the VA, gemfibrozil was cost saving. Using drug prices found outside the VA, a quality-adjusted life-year saved by gemfibrozil therapy cost between $6300 and $17 100.

Conclusions  Gemfibrozil reduces major cardiovascular events in male coronary heart disease patients with low levels of HDL-C and low levels of LDL-C and would result in cost saving at annual drug costs of $100 or less in 1998 dollars. Even at the higher drug prices represented by the average wholesale price in the United States, the cost of a life-year saved is well below the threshold that would be deemed cost-effective. To our knowledge, this is the first economic analysis based on clinical trial data to assess the cost-effectiveness of raising HDL-C levels and lowering triglyceride levels in a setting in which LDL-C levels were not lowered.


From the School of Public Health, Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota (Drs Nyman and Martinson), and Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn (Drs Nelson, Wilt, and Rubins and Mr Nugent); Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, West Haven, Conn (Dr Collins); Statistics Collaborative, Washington, DC (Dr Wittes); Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM (Ms Fye); and Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (Dr Robins). A list of the members of the VA-HIT study group was published previously (N Engl J Med. 1999;341:410-418).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(2):227-228.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Review: PROactive 03: Pioglitazone, type 2 diabetes and reducing macrovascular events -- economic implications?
Bottomley et al.
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease 2006;6:63-70.
ABSTRACT  

The Metabolic Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Clinical Relevance, and Use of Niacin
Ito
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:277-285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacy Data in the VA Health Care System
Smith and Joseph
Med Care Res Rev 2003;60:92S-123S.
ABSTRACT  

Determination of VA Health Care Costs
Barnett
Med Care Res Rev 2003;60:124S-141S.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-Effectiveness of Cyclooxygenase-2 Selective Inhibitors in the Management of Chronic Arthritis
Spiegel et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:795-806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.