You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 20, November 11, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Heterozygous Carriers of Factor V Leiden and a First Spontaneous Venous Thromboembolism

Sabine Eichinger, MD; Ansgar Weltermann, MD; Christine Mannhalter, PhD; Erich Minar, MD; Christine Bialonczyk, MD; Mirko Hirschl, MD; Verena Schönauer, MD; Klaus Lechner, MD; Paul A. Kyrle, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2357-2360.

Background  Factor V (FV) Leiden is a risk factor for venous thrombosis (VT). Data on its influence on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial owing to different study designs and patient cohorts.

Methods  We reevaluated the risk of recurrence among heterozygous carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden with a first spontaneous proximal VT of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism. Patients with secondary VTE, homozygous FV Leiden, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, or long-term anticoagulation were excluded. The study end point was objectively documented, symptomatic, recurrent VTE.

Results  After discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy for a first VTE, we prospectively observed 287 patients, 83 (29%) of whom were heterozygous for FV Leiden. Recurrent VTE was seen in 17 (20%) of 83 patients with and 44 (21.6%) of 204 without FV Leiden. The probability of recurrence among heterozygotes was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-16%), 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%), and 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) after 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, and was not higher than that among patients without the mutation (16%, 23%, and 34%, respectively). The relative risk of recurrence in heterozygotes was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P = .60) after adjustment for confounding variables. The risk of recurrence among patients with and without FV Leiden was not different when sex distribution or duration of anticoagulation therapy was taken into account.

Conclusions  The risk of recurrence is similar among carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden. Heterozygous patients should receive secondary thromboprophylaxis for a similar length of time as patients without FV Leiden.


From the Departments of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostasis (Drs Eichinger, Weltermann, Schönauer, Lechner, and Kyrle), Internal Medicine II, Division of Angiology (Dr Minar), and Laboratory Medicine (Dr Mannhalter), University of Vienna; the Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute for Thrombosis Research (Dr Kyrle); Wilhelminenspital (Dr Bialonzcyk); and Hanuschkrankenhaus (Dr Hirschl), Vienna, Austria.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk of recurrence after a first venous thromboembolic event in young women
Laczkovics et al.
haematol 2007;92:1201-1207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. A systematic review of prospective studies
Marchiori et al.
haematol 2007;92:1107-1114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Testing for thrombophilia: an evidence-based approach
Merriman and Greaves
Postgrad. Med. J. 2006;82:699-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Homozygosity in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Ser128Arg in the E-Selectin Gene Associated With Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism.
Jilma et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1655-1659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification of patients at low risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism by measuring thrombin generation.
Hron et al.
JAMA 2006;296:397-402.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with common thrombophilia: a systematic review.
Ho et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:729-736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recurrence Rate After a First Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Familial Thrombophilia
Vossen et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2005;25:1992-1997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thrombophilia, Clinical Factors, and Recurrent Venous Thrombotic Events
Christiansen et al.
JAMA 2005;293:2352-2361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thrombophilia and New Anticoagulant Drugs
Weitz et al.
ASH Education Book 2004;2004:424-438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy After Initial Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism
Frazee and Chomo
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:1489-1496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

D-Dimer Levels and Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
Eichinger et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1071-1074.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism
Thorax 2003;58:470-483.
FULL TEXT  

Genomic Medicine
Weed et al.
NEJM 2003;348:759-760.
FULL TEXT  

Hypercoagulable state testing and malignancy screening following venous thromboembolic events
Deitcher and Gomes
Vasc Med 2003;8:33-46.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.