You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 21, November 25, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Interhospital Differences in Nosocomial Infection Rates

Importance of Case-Mix Adjustment

Hugo Sax, MD; Didier Pittet, MD, MS; and the Swiss-NOSO Network

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2437-2442.

Background  Nosocomial infection rates are used to assess patient safety and the effectiveness of health care systems, but adjustment for case-mix, a key factor for benchmarking, is often overlooked.

Objectives  To perform a nationwide prevalence study of nosocomial infection and evaluate the impact of hospital size on infection rates.

Methods  One-week–period prevalence study in 18 acute care hospitals ranging from small primary to large tertiary care institutions. All adult inpatients in medical, surgical, and intensive care units hospitalized at time of study were included. Infection prevalence and case-mix determinants were calculated according to hospital size. After each factor was tested for its significance on the occurrence of nosocomial infection, all factors were introduced in a multivariate model with hospital size as the main explanatory variable and nosocomial infection as the dependent variable.

Results  Among 4252 patients, 429 developed 470 nosocomial infections, for an overall prevalence of 10.1% (intensive care units, 29.7%; medical, 9.3%; surgical, 9.2%; and mixed wards, 14.1%). Unadjusted prevalence rates were 6.1% in small, 10.0% in intermediate, and 10.9% in large hospitals (P = .007). Increased comorbidity (odds ratio, 1.80), cancer (1.68), trauma (1.75), neutropenia (4.66), antibiotic exposure (6.64), history of intensive care unit stay (2.14), referral from another hospital (1.87), intubation for 24 hours or more (2.09), and prolonged stay (3.35) were independently associated with nosocomial infection (all P<.05), but hospital size was not.

Conclusions  Higher infection rates observed in larger hospitals were partly associated with unfavorable case mix. Unadjusted rates may lead to erroneous assumptions for health care prioritization.


From the Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland (Drs Sax and Pittet).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Correlation between case mix index and antibiotic use in hospitals
Kuster et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62:837-842.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Administrative data outperformed single-day chart review for comorbidity measure
Luthi et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:225-231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comprehensive Strategy to Prevent Nosocomial Spread of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Highly Endemic Setting
Tomic et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2038-2043.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Healthcare-Associated Infections and Length of Hospital Stay in the Medicare Population
Dulworth and Pyenson
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:121-127.
ABSTRACT  

Does Hospital Size Predict Risk for Nosocomial Infection?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2002;2002:11-11.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.