You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 22, December 9, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (55)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is Impaired Renal Function a Contraindication to the Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin?

Jeff Nagge, BScPhm,BSc; Mark Crowther, MD,MSc; Jack Hirsh, MD,FCCP

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2605-2609.

Background  Because of the risk of accumulation of anticoagulant effect, it has been suggested that patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 mL/min or less (<=0.50 mL/s) should be excluded from treatment with low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin, or have anti–factor Xa heparin level monitoring performed.

Objective  To assess the appropriateness of this recommendation.

Methods  We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts to identify prospective articles comparing differences in the pharmacokinetics of LMW heparins in nondialyzed patients with varying degrees of renal function. Reference lists of retrieved reports were checked for additional articles.

Results  Three single-dose pharmacokinetic trials and 2 multiple-dose deep vein thrombosis (treatment trials met our selection criteria. The 3 trials that could address our primary objective did not support the use of a 30-mL/min (0.50-mL/s) cutoff of creatinine clearance to select individuals at risk of accumulation when LMW heparin is used. Four of the 5 trials support the notion that anti–factor Xa activity of some LMW heparin preparations accumulates in patients with impaired creatinine clearance. Tinzaparin sodium, an LMW heparin with a higher-than-average molecular weight distribution, appears to be the exception, since it did not exhibit accumulation in patients with creatinine clearances as low as 20 mL/min (0.33 mL/s).

Conclusions  The use of a 30-mL/min (0.50-mL/s) cutoff is not justified, on the basis of currently available evidence, to select individuals at increased risk of accumulation when LMW heparin is used. The pharmacokinetic response to impaired renal function may differ among LMW heparin preparations.


From the Department of Pharmacy, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario (Mr Nagge); Department of Medicine, St Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton (Dr Crowther); and Hamilton Civic Hospital Research Center (Dr Hirsh). Mr Nagge is now with the Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Anticoagulation During Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration
David J. W. Knight, David Selwyn, and Keith Girling
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(8):981.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prophylaxis Against Deep Vein Thrombosis in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Renal Insufficiency With the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Dalteparin: An Assessment of Safety and Pharmacodynamics: The DIRECT Study
Douketis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1805-1812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Geerts et al.
Chest 2008;133:381S-453S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Harrington et al.
Chest 2008;133:670S-707S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of newer anticoagulants in patients with chronic kidney disease
Lobo
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:2017-2026.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-Analysis: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Bleeding in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency
Lim et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:673-684.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The heparins: all a nephrologist should know
Hetzel and Sucker
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:2036-2042.
FULL TEXT  

Dose Capping Enoxaparin Is Unjustified and Denies Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes a Potentially Effective Treatment
Spinler et al.
Chest 2005;127:2288-2290.
FULL TEXT  

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in the Elderly
Pineo and Hull
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 2005;11:15-23.
ABSTRACT  

Safety and Efficacy of Low Molecular Weight Heparins for Hemodialysis in Patients with End-Stage Renal Failure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Lim et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15:3192-3206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Hirsh and Raschke
Chest 2004;126:188S-203S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Geerts et al.
Chest 2004;126:338S-400S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Harrington et al.
Chest 2004;126:513S-548S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Initial Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism
McRae and Ginsberg
Circulation 2004;110:I-3-I-9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Bridging Anticoagulation During Interruption of Warfarin: Assessment of a Standardized Periprocedural Anticoagulation Regimen
Douketis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1319-1326.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dosing Practices and Risk Factors for Bleeding in Patients Receiving Enoxaparin for the Treatment of an Acute Coronary Syndrome
Macie et al.
Chest 2004;125:1616-1621.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variability of Plasma Anti-Xa Activities with Different Lots of Enoxaparin
Gosselin et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:563-568.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anticoagulation in Hospitalized Patients With Renal Insufficiency: A Comparison of Bleeding Rates With Unfractionated Heparin vs Enoxaparin
Thorevska et al.
Chest 2004;125:856-863.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Medical Patients
Stark and Kilzer
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:36-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Anticoagulation During Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration
Knight et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:981-981.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.