You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 3, February 11, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pain
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Hyaluronate Sodium on Pain and Physical Functioning in Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Robert John Petrella, MD, PhD; Mathew Dennis DiSilvestro, MSc; Catherine Hildebrand, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:292-298.

Background  Intra-articular hyaluronate sodium is a relatively new therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a large primary care medical center to determine the impact of hyaluronate sodium vs conventional therapy on measures of pain, stiffness, and disability at rest and following functionally relevant walking and stepping activities.

Methods  A total of 120 patients (mean age, 67 years) with unilateral grades 1 to 3 medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: group 1, 2 mL of hyaluronate sodium at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and placebo (100 mg of lactose); group 2, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (75 mg of diclofenac and 200 µg of misoprostol) and hyaluronate sodium; group 3, NSAIDs and placebo (2 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution [saline]); and group 4, placebo (lactose and saline). Intra-articular hyaluronate sodium or saline (2 mL) was administered once weekly over 3 weeks while NSAIDs or lactose were administered twice daily over 12 weeks.

Main Outcome Measures  (1) Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) global measure of pain, stiffness, and disability; (2) visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and following functional walking and stepping activities (self-paced walking and stepping); and (3) functional performance (exercise time, heart rate, and predicted maximum oxygen uptake) at baseline and weeks 4 and 12.

Results  At week 4, significant improvement in WOMAC scores for pain and disability and VAS score for resting pain was observed in groups 1 to 3 compared with baseline measures. Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower self-paced stepping pain, while no change was observed in group 4. At week 12, groups 1 to 3 showed significantly greater improvement in WOMAC pain subscale score and VAS score for resting pain; however, these differences did not vary from week 4. Following self-paced walking and stepping, groups 1 and 2 reported significantly less activity pain, while group 1 showed significantly faster self-paced walking and stepping test results. Groups 1 to 3 improved self-paced walking and stepping time at week 12 compared with baseline measures, while predicted maximum oxygen uptake was significantly higher in the hyaluronate sodium groups 1 and 2 at weeks 4 and 12 compared with baseline measures.

Conclusions  For resting pain relief, hyaluronate sodium seems to be as effective as NSAIDs. Further, for pain with physical activity and functional performance, hyaluronate sodium may be superior to placebo alone or NSAIDs alone.


From the Centre for Activity and Ageing, Lawson Research Institute and Faculties of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London (Dr Petrella); the Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta (Mr DiSilvestro); and Bioniche Life Sciences Inc, Belleville, Ontario (Dr Hildebrand).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Hyaluronate Sodium Injections for Osteoarthritis: Hope, Hype, and Hard Truths
David T. Felson and Jennifer J. Anderson
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(3):245-247.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: systematic review and meta-analysis
Arrich et al.
CMAJ 2005;172:1039-1043.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing Joint Pain in Primary Care
Palmer and Toombs
J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:S32-S42.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis
Lo et al.
JAMA 2003;290:3115-3121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Burden of Pain on the Shoulders of Aging
Beckman
Sci Aging Knowl Environ 2002;2002:oa1-1.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hyaluronic Acid Helps Pain and Disability in OA -- Or Does It?
JWatch General 2002;2002:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Hyaluronate Sodium Injections for Osteoarthritis: Hope, Hype, and Hard Truths
Felson and Anderson
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:245-247.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.