You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 5, March 11, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Thrombolysis
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effectiveness of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly

Cause for Concern in the Old-Old

Stephen B. Soumerai, ScD; Thomas J. McLaughlin, ScD; Dennis Ross-Degnan, ScD; Cindy L. Christiansen, PhD; Jerry H. Gurwitz, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:561-568.

Background  National guidelines have encouraged increased use of thrombolytic therapy for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, evidence supporting thrombolytic therapy in patients 75 years and older is lacking. In a retrospective cohort study of 2659 elderly AMI patients, we determined the association between thrombolytic use and in-hospital mortality by age and among patients with or without absolute or relative contraindications to thrombolytic treatment.

Methods  We abstracted the medical records of 2659 elderly patients admitted with AMI at 37 Minnesota community hospitals between 1992 and 1996. The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, controlling for demographic, clinical, comorbidity, and severity-of-illness variables.

Results  Sixty-three percent of 719 eligible patients received thrombolytic therapy. Twenty-seven percent of thrombolytic recipients had absolute contraindications to treatment. Patients receiving thrombolytic agents had fewer and less severe comorbidities than those not receiving thrombolytic therapy. There was a 4% increase in the odds of death for every 1-year increase in age for all thrombolytic recipients vs nonrecipients (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08; P = .03). Among patients with 1 or more contraindication, the OR for death associated with thrombolytic use was 1.57 (95% CI, 1.03-2.40; P = .04). The adjusted odds of death among eligible thrombolytic recipients (vs nonrecipients) increased significantly with age (OR, 1.08 per year; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = .008). Among eligible patients aged 80 to 90 years, the predicted odds of death among thrombolytic recipients vs nonrecipients was 1.4. Among eligible patients younger than 80 years, thrombolytic use was associated with reduced mortality.

Conclusions  Our findings suggest the need for more research on the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for AMI patients 75 years and older and for more careful selection of elderly patients for this treatment.


From the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Mass (Drs Soumerai, McLaughlin, and Ross-Degnan); the Boston University School of Public Health, Health Services Department and Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research at Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Bedford, Mass (Dr Christiansen); and The Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, and the Fallon Healthcare System, Worcester (Dr Gurwitz).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(5):615.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly, Part II: ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: In Collaboration With the Society of Geriatric Cardiology
Alexander et al.
Circulation 2007;115:2570-2589.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions on Outcomes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pennsylvania
Hollenbeak et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:85-94.
ABSTRACT  

Informal caregivers and the risk of nursing home admission among individuals enrolled in the program of all-inclusive care for the elderly.
Friedman et al.
Gerontologist 2006;46:456-463.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary care unit admission of very old patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Martinez-Selles et al.
Heart 2006;92:549-550.
FULL TEXT  

Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates
Shojania et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:408-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of thrombolytic therapy on the risk of cardiac rupture and mortality in older patients with first acute myocardial infarction
Bueno et al.
Eur Heart J 2005;26:1705-1711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management and Outcomes of Elderly Women and Men With Acute Coronary Syndromes in 2000 and 2002
Moriel et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1521-1526.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolytic Therapy
Heuschmann et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1831-1838.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome in Elderly Patients Undergoing Primary Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial
Guagliumi et al.
Circulation 2004;110:1598-1604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes After Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients Who Are Ineligible for Reperfusion Therapy: Preliminary Results From the TETAMI Registry and Randomized Trial
Cohen et al.
Circulation 2003;108:III-14-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Synergistic treatment of ST-segmentelevation myocardial infarction with pharmacoinvasive recanalization
Dauerman and Sobel
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:646-651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editorial: Hot Topics in Geriatrics
Morley
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2003;58:M30-36.
FULL TEXT  

Thrombolytics Are Not Contraindicated in the Very Old
Smith et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2139-2140.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.