You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 5, March 11, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (55)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Prognostic Value of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Treated Hypertensive Men

Athanase Benetos, MD, PhD; Frédérique Thomas, PhD; Kathryn Bean, MA, MPH; Sylvie Gautier, MD; Harold Smulyan, MD; Louis Guize, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:577-581.

Background  The aim of this study was to assess the cardiovascular risk in hypertensive subjects according to systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels.

Methods  The study sample consisted of 4714 hypertensive men, treated by their physician, who had a standard health checkup at the d'Investigations Préventives et Cliniques Center, Paris, France, between 1972 and 1988. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality were assessed for a mean period of 14 years.

Results  Among treated subjects, 85.5% presented uncontrolled values for SBP (>=40 mm Hg) and/or DBP (>=90 mm Hg). After adjustment for age and associated risk factors, these subjects presented an increased risk for CVD mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.64) and for CHD mortality (RR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.03-5.35) compared with controlled subjects. After adjustment for age, associated risk factors, and DBP, and compared with subjects with SBP under 140 mm Hg, the RR for CVD mortality was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.04-3.13) in subjects with SBP between 140 and 160 mm Hg and 1.94 (95% CI, 1.10-3.43) in subjects with SBP over 160 mm Hg. By contrast, after adjustment for SBP levels, CVD risk was not associated with DBP. Compared with subjects with DBP under 90 mm Hg, RR for CVD mortality was 1.17 (95% CI, 0.80-1.70) in subjects with DBP between 90 and 99 mm Hg and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.67-1.56) in subjects with DBP over 100 mm Hg. Similar results were observed for CHD mortality.

Conclusions  In hypertensive men treated in clinical practice, SBP is a good predictor of CVD and CHD risk. Diastolic blood pressure, which remains the main criterion used by most physicians to determine drug efficacy, appears to be of little value in determining cardiovascular risk. Evaluation of risk in treated individuals should take SBP rather than DBP values into account.


From the Centre d'Investigations Préventives et Cliniques (Drs Benetos, Thomas, and Guize and Ms Bean) and Institut de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U337 (Drs Benetos and Gautier), Paris, France; and Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, New York, NY (Dr Smulyan).


RELATED ARTICLE

The Changing Face of Hypertension: Is Systolic Blood Pressure the Final Answer?
Prakash C. Deedwania
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(5):506-508.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Blood Pressure Control and Improved Cardiovascular Outcomes in the International Verapamil SR-Trandolapril Study
Mancia et al.
Hypertension 2007;50:299-305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving blood pressure control through provider education, provider alerts, and patient education: a cluster randomized trial.
Roumie et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:165-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dogma Disputed: Can Aggressively Lowering Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Be Dangerous?
Messerli et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:884-893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Therapy Modifications in Response to Poorly Controlled Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, and Diabetes Mellitus
Rodondi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:475-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Study of Hypertension and Risk of Uterine Leiomyomata
Boynton-Jarrett et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:628-638.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atherosclerosis of the aorta: Risk factor, risk marker, or innocent bystander?: A prospective population-based transesophageal echocardiography study
Meissner et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1018-1024.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Hypertension Management After Stroke and Myocardial Infarction: Results From ECLAT1--A French Nationwide Study
Amar et al.
Stroke 2004;35:1579-1583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dietary Sodium Restriction Rapidly Improves Large Elastic Artery Compliance in Older Adults With Systolic Hypertension
Gates et al.
Hypertension 2004;44:35-41.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Influence of Family History of Hypertension and Premature Myocardial Infarction on Systolic Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Mass Trajectories in Youth
Dekkers et al.
Pediatrics 2003;111:1387-1393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure in Treated Hypertensive Men: Clarification
Benetos et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:121-121.
FULL TEXT  

Relation between blood pressure after an acute coronary event and subsequent cardiovascular risk
Wong and White
Heart 2002;88:555-558.
FULL TEXT  

Undertreatment of Hypertension: A Dozen Reasons
Gupta et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2246-2248.
FULL TEXT  

The Changing Face of Hypertension: Is Systolic Blood Pressure the Final Answer?
Deedwania
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:506-508.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.