You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 6, March 25, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Worklife and Satisfaction of General Internists

Tosha B. Wetterneck, MD; Mark Linzer, MD; Julia E. McMurray, MD; Jeffrey Douglas, PhD; Mark D. Schwartz, MD; JudyAnn Bigby, MD; Martha S. Gerrity, MD; Donald E. Pathman, MD, MPH; David Karlson, PhD; Elnora Rhodes; for the Society of General Internal Medicine Career Satisfaction Study Group

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:649-656.

Background  Prior studies have reported relatively low job satisfaction for general internists. We used data from a large US physician survey to assess correlates of satisfaction of general internists.

Methods  The Physician Worklife Survey was mailed to a national random stratified sample of 5704 US physicians. General internists were assessed for their satisfaction, training, patient mix, work hours, the likelihood of recommending their specialty to medical students, and job stability. We then compared them with a specialist sample (internal medicine subspecialists [IMSSs]) and a primary care sample (family physicians [FPs]). Logistic regression was used to model predictors of satisfaction, stress, and medical student recruitment.

Results  There were 2326 respondents (adjusted response rate, 52%): 450 (19%) were general internists; 502 (22%), FPs; and 438 (19%), IMSSs. General internists were less satisfied than were IMSSs with their relationships with colleagues and with patient care issues (P<.01 for both) and less satisfied than were FPs with community ties (P = .001). Global job, career, and specialty satisfaction were significantly lower for general internists vs FPs and IMSSs (P<.05). General internists spent proportionately more of their work week in the hospital than did FPs (20% vs 13%; P<.001) and more time providing outpatient care than did IMSSs (56% vs 42%; P<.001). General internists had more patients with complex medical and psychosocial problems than did FPs (P<.01) but fewer patients with complex medical problems than did IMSSs (P<.001). Higher satisfaction for general internists was associated with older physician age, less time pressure during office visits, fewer work hours, and fewer patients with complex psychosocial problems (P<.05 for all). General internists were less likely than were FPs to recommend their specialty to medical students (P<.001). Specialty satisfaction, female gender, and control of hassles predicted medical student recruitment by general internists.

Conclusions  General internists' role of caring for patients with complex problems is associated with lower levels of satisfaction than for IMSSs and FPs. Adjusting caseload for patient complexity, expanding time for office visits, and additional training in the care of patients with psychosocially complex problems may improve the job satisfaction of general internists and medical student recruitment into the specialty.


From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Wetterneck, Linzer, and McMurray) and Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Dr Douglas), University of Wisconsin, Madison; the Department of Primary Care and Internal Medicine, New York University, New York (Dr Schwartz); the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Bigby); the Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Dr Gerrity); the Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Pathman); and the Society of General Internal Medicine, Washington, DC (Dr Karlson and Ms Rhodes).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(6):722-723.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors Associated With Medical Students' Career Choices Regarding Internal Medicine
Hauer et al.
JAMA 2008;300:1154-1164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Residency Duty-Hour Limits: Views of Key Clinical Faculty
Reed et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1487-1492.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Physician Career Satisfaction, Work-Life Balance, and Burnout
Keeton et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:949-955.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Primary Care-Specialty Income Gap: Why It Matters
Bodenheimer et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:301-306.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Continuity Clinic Patients Less Satisfied When Residents Have a Heavy Inpatient Workload?
Feddock et al.
Eval Health Prof 2005;28:390-399.
ABSTRACT  

Emotional Aspects of Computer-based Provider Order Entry: A Qualitative Study
Sittig et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:561-567.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes and Perceptions of Internal Medicine Residents Regarding Pulmonary and Critical Care Subspecialty Training
Lorin et al.
Chest 2005;127:630-636.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trust: Can We Create the Time?
Levine
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:930-932.
FULL TEXT  

A Review of Physician Turnover: Rates, Causes, and Consequences
Misra-Hebert et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:56-66.
ABSTRACT  

Trends in Career Choice by US Medical School Graduates
Newton and Grayson
JAMA 2003;290:1179-1182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Do Doctors Find Meaningful about Their Work?
Horowitz et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:772-775.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.