You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 15, August 11, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Adherence
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quality Assessment of a Collaborative Approach for Decreasing Drug-Related Morbidity and Achieving Therapeutic Goals

Brian J. Isetts, PhD, BCPS; Lawrence M. Brown, PharmD; Stephen W. Schondelmeyer, PharmD, PhD; Lois A. Lenarz, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1813-1820.

Background  Collaboration between physicians and pharmacists is one approach to address drug-related morbidity and achieve therapeutic goals. A collaborative practice of pharmaceutical care has been used in the Fairview Clinics System of Minneapolis-St Paul since 1999.

Methods  The quality of therapeutic determinations made by pharmacists within this collaborative practice of pharmaceutical care was studied by a 12-member panel of physicians and pharmacists who used randomly selected patient records. This was a quality improvement and care process validation component of a study evaluating the effects of drug therapy management in patients receiving prepaid medical assistance. An implicit review process was used to evaluate the clinical credibility of therapeutic determinations made by pharmaceutical care practitioners.

Results  A total of 5780 drug therapy problems were resolved for 2524 patients receiving pharmaceutical care. The rate of therapeutic goals achieved increased from 74% at the time of patients' initial pharmaceutical care encounters to 89% at patients' latest encounters. In this quality assessment analysis panel members performed a total of 4779 evaluations of clinical decisions. Panelists indicated agreement with the evaluations in 94.2% of cases, expressed a neutral opinion in 3.6% of cases, and disagreed in 2.2% of cases. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.85.

Conclusions  The decisions made by pharmaceutical care practitioners working in collaboration with physicians to provide drug therapy management services are clinically credible based on the evaluations and comments of a peer review panel. This study provides information on the quality of care provided by pharmacists when collaborating with physicians to provide drug therapy management services.


From the College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Drs Isetts, Brown, and Schondelmeyer), and the Fairview Clinics System, Minneapolis-St Paul (Dr Lenarz). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Strategic approach for improving the medication-use process in health systems: The high-performance pharmacy practice framework
Vermeulen et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1699-1710.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CPT code-change proposal: National data on pharmacists' medication therapy management services
Isetts et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1642-1646.
FULL TEXT  

Use of personal digital assistants for documentation of pharmacists' interventions: A literature review
Fox et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1516-1525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survey of pharmacist collaborative drug therapy management in hospitals
Thomas et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:2489-2499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are newer, more expensive pharmacotherapy options associated with superior symptom control compared to less costly agents used in a collaborative practice setting?
Weschules et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2006;23:135-149.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.