This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (39)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Neurology  • Alzheimer Disease  • Dementias  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Updated Meta-analysis

A. Mark Clarfield, MD, FRCPC

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2219-2229.

Background  In 1988, 2 meta-analyses suggested that the prevalence of reversible dementia was significantly lower than had been previously estimated. It was predicted that further work would indicate an even lower rate. The present study represents an updated meta-analysis of the true prevalence of reversible dementia.

Methods  MEDLINE was searched from 1987 through 2002. References were also gleaned from pertinent articles and relevant textbooks. Data were extracted on the nature and provenance of the studies, dementia etiology, and the proportion of cases that were potentially reversible and reversed.

Results  Fifty articles were identified of which 39 met the study criteria, representing 7042 patients of whom 5620 (87.2%) had dementia. Patients were classified according to etiology and, where possible (in 23 [59%] of 39 studies), whether the dementia partially or completely resolved. A much higher proportion of studies than was previously the case were either community-based (31%) or observed subjects from outpatient departments (54%). Alzheimer disease was still the commonest cause of dementia (56.3%) followed by a vascular etiology (20.3%). Conditions requiring neuroimaging made up only 2.2% of cases. Potentially reversible causes were seen in 9%, and only 0.6% of dementia cases actually reversed (0.29% partially, 0.31% fully).

Conclusions  The reported proportion of dementias that reverse is much lower than previously thought. While comorbidity should always be treated for its own sake and in the hope that cognitive decline may at least be delayed, the present findings have significant clinical and economic implications for the workup of dementia.

From the Department of Geriatrics, Soroka Hospital, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel; and Division of Geriatric Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis–Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. The author has no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Educational Differentials in Life Expectancy With Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly in the United States
Lievre et al.
J Aging Health 2008;20:456-477.
ABSTRACT  

Role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of dementia
O'BRIEN
Br. J. Radiol. 2007;80:S71-S77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of collaborative care for older adults with Alzheimer disease in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.
Callahan et al.
JAMA 2006;295:2148-2157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence and Causes of Nondegenerative Nonvascular Dementia: A Population-Based Study
Knopman et al.
Arch Neurol 2006;63:218-221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reversible dementia--the implications of a fall in prevalence
Clarfield
Age Ageing 2005;34:544-545.
FULL TEXT  

Methods to improve the detection of mild cognitive impairment
Shankle et al.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005;102:4919-4924.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery from dementia: An interesting case
Knopman and Jankowiak
Neurology 2005;64:E18-E19.
FULL TEXT  

Early Alzheimer's Disease
Clarfield et al.
NEJM 2004;350:80-82.
FULL TEXT  

Minerva
BMJ 2003;327:1296-1296.
FULL TEXT