 |
|
Improving the Quality of Care for Patients With Pneumonia in Very Small Hospitals
Laurie Anne Chu, MD;
Dale W. Bratzler, DO, MPH;
Roger J. Lewis, MD, PhD;
Cynthia Murray, PhD;
Lori Moore, RN;
Claudette Shook, RN;
Scott R. Weingarten, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:326-332.
Background Despite the publication of guidelines for the management of pneumonia, significant variation in care continues to exist. While there have been several published reports of quality improvement projects for pneumonia, there are few data on the effectiveness of these efforts in small hospitals. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a project implemented by a quality improvement organization in small hospitals would lead to an improvement in care that could not be accounted for by secular trends in the management of pneumonia.
Methods Medicare-insured hospital admissions for pneumonia were reviewed from 20 small hospitals in Oklahoma (intervention group) at baseline and after feedback. Project intervention included onsite feedback presentations to the medical staff, samples of performance improvement materials, and comparative measures of performance of predefined quality indicators. A second group of 16 demographically similar hospitals (control group) was selected for review during the same 2 periods. These hospitals subsequently underwent an identical intervention with a follow-up assessment.
Results Statistically significant improvements in process measures were demonstrated in the intervention hospitals, including performance of a sputum (P<.01) and blood (P<.001) cultures, antibiotic administration within 4 hours of hospital admission (P<.001), and administration of the first dose of antibiotic in the emergency department (P<.001). These measures in the control hospitals did not change significantly (P = .93, .08, .79, and .52, respectively) during the 2 periods.
Conclusions Improvements in processes of care achieved by the intervention hospitals resulted from activities initiated because of participation in a quality improvement organization–directed project. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of quality improvement activities in very small hospitals.
From Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif (Drs Chu and Lewis); the Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality, Oklahoma City (Drs Bratzler and Murray and Mss Moore and Shook); Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond (Dr Murray); and Cedars-Sinai Health System, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA School of Medicine, and Zynx Health, Inc, Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Weingarten).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Accelerating Best Care in Pennsylvania: Adapting a Large Academic System's Quality Improvement Process to Rural Community Hospitals
Haydar et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:252-258.
ABSTRACT
A Hospital-Randomized Controlled Trial of an Educational Quality Improvement Intervention in Rural and Small Community Hospitals in Texas Following Implementation of Information Technology
Filardo et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:418-427.
ABSTRACT
Implementing a hospital guideline on pneumonia: a semi-quantitative review
Cortoos et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:358-367.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Selected Hospital Characteristics on the Timeliness of Antibiotic Administration for Pneumonia
Mitchiner and Hutto
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:259-264.
ABSTRACT
Barriers to optimal antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia at hospitals: a qualitative study
Schouten et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:143-149.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis
Barlow et al.
Thorax 2007;62:67-74.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assessment of the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization Program
Rollow et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:342-353.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Volume, quality of care, and outcome in pneumonia.
Lindenauer et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:262-269.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Validation of a predictive rule for the management of community-acquired pneumonia
Capelastegui et al.
Eur Respir J 2006;27:151-157.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Yealy et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:881-894.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Guidelines for the diagnoses and treatment of adult lower respiratory tract infections: a true "European cooperative effort"
Restrepo and Anzueto
Eur Respir J 2005;26:979-981.
FULL TEXT
Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care--Reply
Snyder and Anderson
JAMA 2005;294:2030-2030.
FULL TEXT
Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care
Bratzler
JAMA 2005;294:2028-2029.
FULL TEXT
Understanding variation in quality of antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia: effect of patient, professional and hospital factors
Schouten et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:575-582.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Limited Impact of a Multicenter Intervention To Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Pneumonia Care
Halm et al.
Chest 2004;126:100-107.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality assessment program in primary care clinics: a tool for quality improvement
Mandel et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:175-180.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
