You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 4, February 24, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Surgery
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Review
 •Oncology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Detection of Proximal Adenomatous Polyps With Screening Sigmoidoscopy

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Screening Colonoscopy

James D. Lewis, MD, MSCE; Kimmie Ng, MD; Kenneth E. Hung, MD, PhD; Warren B. Bilker, PhD; Jesse A. Berlin, ScD; Colleen Brensinger, MS; Anil K. Rustgi, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:413-420.

Background  The relative effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer depends on the magnitude of the association between findings in the proximal and distal colon and the false-negative rate of screening sigmoidoscopy for proximal neoplasia. To address this, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy studies.

Methods  Published studies through July 31, 2000, of asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy were identified from the MEDLINE database. We generated pooled estimates of the odds ratio for the association between findings in the distal and proximal colon and the prevalence of isolated proximal adenomatous neoplasia.

Results  Using the sigmoid–descending colon junction to identify the beginning of the distal colon, the pooled odds ratio for the association between distal adenomatous polyps and any proximal neoplasia was 2.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-4.05). Diminutive distal adenomatous polyps were also associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.30-4.29). Distal hyperplastic polyps were not associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.79-2.62). The prevalence of isolated advanced proximal neoplasia in the 3 studies was 2%, 3%, and 5%. Using the sigmoid–descending colon junction to identify the beginning of the distal colon yields a pooled estimate of isolated proximal neoplasia of 16.3% (95% CI, 13.6%-19.1%).

Conclusions  Distal adenomatous polyps, including diminutive distal adenomatous polyps, are associated with an increased prevalence of synchronous proximal neoplasia. Two percent to 5% of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy may have isolated advanced proximal neoplasia. Even more patients may have isolated nonadvanced proximal neoplasia.


From the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (Drs Lewis, Ng, Hung, and Rustgi), the Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Drs Lewis, Bilker, and Berlin and Ms Brensinger) and Genetics (Dr Rustgi), the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Lewis, Bilker, and Berlin and Ms Brensinger), the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Dr Lewis), and the University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center (Drs Lewis and Rustgi), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.


RELATED LETTERS

Prevalence of Isolated Advanced Proximal Neoplasia
Robert E. Schoen
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(17):2103.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Isolated Advanced Proximal Neoplasia—Reply
James D. Lewis, Kimmie Ng, Kenneth E. Hung, Warren B. Bilker, Jesse A. Berlin, Colleen Brensinger, and Anil K. Rustgi
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(17):2103-2104.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Colorectal Polypectomy and Risk of Colorectal Cancer by Subsite: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study
Yoshida et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007;0:hym065v1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optical Markers in Duodenal Mucosa Predict the Presence of Pancreatic Cancer
Liu et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4392-4399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Variation in Base Excision Repair Genes and the Prevalence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma
Berndt et al.
Cancer Res. 2007;67:1395-1404.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colon cancer screening: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Roy et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2177-2179.
FULL TEXT  

Population screening for colorectal cancer
DTB 2006;44:65-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.
Singh et al.
JAMA 2006;295:2366-2373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Stratification of Colon Carcinogenesis through Enhanced Backscattering Spectroscopy Analysis of the Uninvolved Colonic Mucosa
Roy et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:961-968.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hemochromatosis Gene Mutations, Body Iron Stores, Dietary Iron, and Risk of Colorectal Adenoma in Women
Chan et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:917-926.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group
Levin et al.
Gut 2005;54:807-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Proximal Colon Neoplasia With Distal Hyperplastic Polyps: A Meta-analysis
Lin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:382-390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hemochromatosis Gene Mutations and Distal Adenomatous Colorectal Polyps
McGlynn et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:158-163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Isolated Advanced Proximal Neoplasia
Schoen
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2103-2103.
FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Isolated Advanced Proximal Neoplasia--Reply
Lewis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2103-2104.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.