This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (12)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Health Policy  • Medical Practice, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Gerard F. Anderson, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:437-442.

Background  Chronic conditions are the leading reason why people seek medical care, yet the current financing and delivery system has been criticized for not promoting ongoing care. The perceptions of physicians, policymakers, and the general public were compared on how well the current system addresses the needs of people with chronic conditions.

Methods  National surveys of 1238 physicians and 1663 Americans and a convenience sample of 155 policymakers were compared. All 3 groups were given the same definition of a chronic condition and asked similar questions.

Results  There was strong agreement that chronic medical conditions affect men and women of all ages, ethnicities, and income levels (>90% strongly or somewhat agree). However, compared with the public and physicians, policymakers were less likely to respond that people with chronic conditions usually receive adequate medical care, that health insurance pays for most needed services, or that government programs are adequate. The public was most positive about the current system and policymakers the least. A majority of all 3 groups agreed that it is somewhat or very difficult for people with chronic conditions to obtain adequate care from primary care physicians, medical specialists, and other health care professionals.

Conclusions  A majority of physicians, policymakers, and the general public are concerned that the current health care system is not addressing the needs of people with chronic conditions. Changes in how medical care is financed and delivered are necessary to respond to these concerns.

From Partnership for Solutions: Better Lives for People with Chronic Conditions, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Supporting self-management for patients with complex medical needs: recommendations of a working group
Bayliss et al.
Chronic Illness 2007;3:167-175.
ABSTRACT  

Medicare and Chronic Conditions
Anderson
NEJM 2005;353:305-309.
FULL TEXT  

The Future of Generalism in Medicine
Larson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:689-690.
FULL TEXT  

Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions
Epping-Jordan et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:299-305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Persistence and Resurgence of Medical Pluralism
Goldstein
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2004;29:925-946.
 

Health Care System Chaos Should Spur Innovation: Summary of a Report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine
Larson and the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Ta
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:639-643.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT