You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 6, March 24, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Echinacea and Truth in Labeling

Christine M. Gilroy, MD; John F. Steiner, MD, MPH; Tim Byers, MD, MPH; Howard Shapiro, PhD; William Georgian, MS

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:699-704.

Background  Echinacea sales represent 10% of the dietary supplement market in the United States, but there is no guarantee as to the content, quality, variability, or contamination in Echinacea preparations.

Objective  To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the contents of Echinacea-only preparations available in a retail setting.

Methods  One of each single-herb Echinacea preparations that were available in August 2000 was obtained from several stores in the Denver, Colo, area. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was used to determine species and measure quantity. From this information, accuracy of species labeling and comparison of constituent to labeled content were assessed. The samples were stratified by whether they were labeled as standardized, and the standardized and nonstandardized samples were compared by ratio of constituent to labeled content.

Results  Of the samples, 6 (10%) of 59 preparations contained no measurable Echinacea. The assayed species content was consistent with labeled content in 31 (52%) of the samples. Of the 21 standardized preparations, 9 (43%) met the quality standard described on the label. Labeled milligrams were weakly associated with measured constituent (r = 0.35; P = .02).

Conclusions  Echinacea from retail stores often does not contain the labeled species. A claim of "standardization" does not mean the preparation is accurately labeled, nor does it indicate less variability in concentration of constituents of the herb.


From the Departments of General Internal Medicine (Drs Gilroy and Steiner), Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Dr Byers), Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Dr Shapiro), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver; HealthONE Alliance, Denver (Drs Gilroy and Shapiro); and S&W Microchemical, East Lyme, Conn (Mr Georgian). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ginkgo biloba and Acetazolamide Prophylaxis for Acute Mountain Sickness: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Chow et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:296-301.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Herbal Remedies in the United States: Potential Adverse Interactions With Anticancer Agents
Sparreboom et al.
JCO 2004;22:2489-2503.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Echinacea and Clarification
Chopra
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2536-2536.
FULL TEXT  

Immune System Effects of Echinacea, Ginseng, and Astragalus: A Review
Block and Mead
Integr Cancer Ther 2003;2:247-267.
ABSTRACT  

A 65-Year-Old Woman With Acute Cough Illness and an Important Engagement
Gonzales
JAMA 2003;289:2701-2708.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.