You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 8, April 28, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index

Validation of a Tool for Predicting Bleeding Rates in Patients Treated for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Philip S. Wells, MD; Melissa A. Forgie, MD; Maureen Simms, BSc; Alison Greene; Donna Touchie, BSc; Geoffrey Lewis, MSc; Jodi Anderson; Marc A. Rodger, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:917-920.

Background  Long-term anticoagulation prevents recurrent thrombosis in patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, but with a risk of clinically important so-called major bleeding. Physician- and patient-based decisions on the optimal duration of therapy are sensitive to the bleeding risk. The Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index potentially provides a means of calculating the potential risk of bleeding using easily elicited clinical findings, but, to our knowledge, the authors of the index have provided the only published validation of it. We sought to determine the accuracy of the index in our population of patients.

Methods  We prospectively applied the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index to consecutive patients in our clinic who had been objectively diagnosed as having pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis and who were about to undergo standard therapy. Standard therapy consisted of a minimum of 5 days of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy overlapped with warfarin sodium therapy, and continuation of warfarin therapy for at least 3 months, with a target international normalized ratio of 2.5. Patients were placed in 3 risk groups (low, moderate, or high), as defined by the index. The survival curves of the groups, using major hemorrhages as the events, were then compared by the log-rank test.

Results  Bleeding rates were lower than expected, but the index did discriminate between low- and moderate-risk groups (P = .03, log-rank test). The rate of major hemorrhage per 100 person-years was 0% (95% confidence interval, 0%-2.8%) in the low-risk group and 4.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.1%-11.1%) in the moderate-risk group. The rate in the high-risk group could not be defined because only 2 patients were at high risk.

Conclusion  The Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index discriminates between low- and moderate-risk patients, and could be used to guide decisions on the optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy.


From the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Health Research Institute (Drs Wells, Forgie, and Rodger, and Mss Simms, Greene, Touchie, and Anderson), and the Department of Pharmacy, Ottawa Hospital (Mr Lewis), Ottawa, Ontario. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant and Thrombolytic Treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Schulman et al.
Chest 2008;133:257S-298S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An update on cardioembolic stroke
Weir
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:133-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bleeding Complications With Warfarin Use: A Prevalent Adverse Effect Resulting in Regulatory Action
Wysowski et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1414-1419.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fixed-Dose Unfractionated Heparin vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism
Bhala et al.
JAMA 2007;297:261-261.
FULL TEXT  

Bleeding risk stratification models in deciding on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a useful complement to stroke risk stratification schema.
Kakar et al.
Chest 2006;130:1296-1299.
FULL TEXT  

Development of a contemporary bleeding risk model for elderly warfarin recipients.
Shireman et al.
Chest 2006;130:1390-1396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continuing Anticoagulation Following Venous Thromboembolism
Krakow and Ortel
JAMA 2005;294:3088-3088.
FULL TEXT  

Warfarin plus Aspirin after Myocardial Infarction or the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Meta-Analysis with Estimates of Risk and Benefit
Rothberg et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:241-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy
Smythe et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2004;17:327-346.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.