 |
|
Unnecessary Use of Antimicrobials in Hospitalized Patients
Current Patterns of Misuse With an Emphasis on the Antianaerobic Spectrum of Activity
Michelle T. Hecker, MD;
David C. Aron, MD, MS;
Nilam P. Patel, PharmD;
Meghan K. Lehmann, PharmD;
Curtis J. Donskey, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:972-978.
Background Unnecessary use of antimicrobials contributes to the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant nosocomial pathogens in part through elimination of normal anaerobic bacterial flora that inhibit overgrowth of pathogenic microorganisms.
Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in a 650-bed, university-affiliated hospital. All adult nonintensive care inpatients for whom new antimicrobials were prescribed during a 2-week period were monitored throughout their hospitalization. We examined how often antimicrobials, in particular those with antianaerobic activity, were used unnecessarily. The reasons for unnecessary therapy were assessed and common patterns of unnecessary use were identified.
Results A total of 1941 antimicrobial days of therapy were prescribed for 129 patients. A total of 576 (30%) of the 1941 days of therapy were deemed unnecessary. The most common reasons for unnecessary therapy included administration of antimicrobials for longer than recommended durations (192 days of therapy), administration of antimicrobials for noninfectious or nonbacterial syndromes (187 days of therapy), and treatment of colonizing or contaminating microorganisms (94 days of therapy). Antianaerobic agents accounted for 203 (35%) of the 576 unnecessary antimicrobial days of therapy, and these agents were also frequently prescribed (98 days of therapy) when equally efficacious alternative regimens with minimal antianaerobic activity were available.
Conclusions In our institution, hospitalized patients frequently received unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, and antianaerobic agents were often prescribed when this spectrum of activity was not indicated.
From the Division of Infectious Diseases (Dr Hecker) and Department of Pharmacy (Drs Patel and Lehmann), MetroHealth Medical Center, and Center for Quality Improvement Research (Dr Aron) and Infectious Diseases Section (Dr Donskey), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. Drs Hecker, Aron, Patel, and Lehmann have no relevant financial interest in this article. Dr Donskey has received research grant support from Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical (Raritan, NJ).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in a long-term care facility: hypothesis about selection and transmission
Eveillard et al.
Age Ageing 2008;37:294-299.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in general surgery: a critical appraisal
Tourmousoglou et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:214-218.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Electronic Surveillance System for Monitoring Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Voit et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:1317-1322.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Handheld Computer-based Decision Support Reduces Patient Length of Stay and Antibiotic Prescribing in Critical Care
Sintchenko et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:398-402.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Nationwide Antibiogram Analysis Using NCCLS M39-A Guidelines
Zapantis et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:2629-2634.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Wild Birds in Sweden
Waldenstrom et al.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:2438-2441.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improving compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines: a time-series intervention analysis
Mol et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:550-557.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Baseline Results From the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project
Bratzler et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:174-182.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals: risk factors and responses
Louie and Meddings
CMAJ 2004;171:45-46.
FULL TEXT
|
