This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (50)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cardiovascular System  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Lynn E. Eberly, PhD; Jeremiah Stamler, MD; James D. Neaton, PhD; for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1077-1083.

Background  It remains unclear whether hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), and whether fasting and nonfasting triglyceride (TG) levels are equally predictive.

Methods  A total of 2809 (of 12 866) men randomized during 1973 through 1975 into the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial with fasting and nonfasting TG levels measured at baseline were followed up for CHD incidence and death. Proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations of fasting and nonfasting TG levels with CHD.

Results  Average fasting and nonfasting TG levels were 187 and 284 mg/dL (2.11 and 3.21 mmol/L), respectively. Prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (200 mg/dL [2.26 mmol/L] or more) was 31% for fasting and 61% for nonfasting. There were 175 nonfatal or fatal CHD events during 8 years and 328 CHD deaths during 25 years. Compared with TG levels less than 200 mg/dL, risk factor–adjusted hazard ratios for CHD mortality for hypertriglyceridemia were 1.24 (P = .09) for fasting and 1.26 (P = .07) for nonfasting. For nonfatal or fatal CHD, fasting and nonfasting TG levels were similarly predictive with hazard ratios of 1.64 (P = .004) for fasting and 1.46 (P = .03) for nonfasting. These associations for fasting TG levels were assessed to be underestimated by 56% because of regression dilution bias, with attenuation likely greater for nonfasting TG levels.

Conclusions  Greater ease of obtaining nonfasting than fasting measurements, greater prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia with nonfasting than fasting values, and similarly increased risk with each indicate that nonfasting TG levels may be more useful than fasting ones for risk stratification.

From the Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Drs Eberly and Neaton); and Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (Dr Stamler). The principal investigators and senior staff of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial clinical, coordinating, and support centers and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute project office were published previously (JAMA. 1982;248:1476-1477). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hypertriglyceridemia and Its Pharmacologic Treatment Among US Adults
Ford et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:572-578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fasting and Nonfasting Lipid Levels: Influence of Normal Food Intake on Lipids, Lipoproteins, Apolipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction
Langsted et al.
Circulation 2008;118:2047-2056.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Lipids and Apolipoproteins for Predicting Incident Cardiovascular Events
Mora et al.
Circulation 2008;118:993-1001.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fasting versus Nonfasting Triglycerides: Implications for Laboratory Measurements
Warnick and Nakajima
Clin. Chem. 2008;54:14-16.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of dietary composition on postprandial endothelial function and adiponectin concentrations in healthy humans: a crossover controlled study
Shimabukuro et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007;86:923-928.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduction of Visceral Fat Is Associated With Decrease in the Number of Metabolic Risk Factors in Japanese Men
Okauchi et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:2392-2394.
FULL TEXT  

Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women
Bansal et al.
JAMA 2007;298:309-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on the Development of Cardiovascular Disease in a General Japanese Population: The Hisayama Study
Ninomiya et al.
Stroke 2007;38:2063-2069.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship of Metabolic Syndrome to Periodontal Disease in Japanese Women: The Hisayama Study
Shimazaki et al.
JDR 2007;86:271-275.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short-term Administration of Orlistat Reduced Daytime Triglyceridemia in Obese Women With the Metabolic Syndrome
Tzotzas et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2007;58:26-33.
ABSTRACT  

The association of lipid levels with mortality in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis
Habib et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2881-2892.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High Plasma Concentration of Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Obese Children and Adolescents
Choi et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:2305-2310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 3.
Smellie et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2006;59:781-789.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Metabolic Syndrome vs Framingham Risk Score for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Wannamethee et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2644-2650.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Remnant-Like Particles Independent Predictors of Coronary Heart Disease Incidence?: The Honolulu Heart Study
Imke et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2005;25:1718-1722.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Plasma triglycerides and type III hyperlipidemia are independently associated with premature familial coronary artery disease
Hopkins et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1003-1012.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Useful Is Measuring Nonfasting Triglyceride Level?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2003;2003:2-2.
FULL TEXT