This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (12)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Life  • Musculoskeletal Syndromes (Chronic Fatigue, Gulf War)  • Neurology  • Alert me on articles by topic

A Focus on Function

Susan D. Ross, MD, FRCPC; Rhonda P. Estok, RN, BSN, CNOR; Diana Frame, MEM; Linda R. Stone, RN, MS, CPNP; Veronica Ludensky, BA; Cindy B. Levine, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1098-1107.

Background  Evidence was sought in the published literature on how best to measure, monitor, and treat disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Methods  A systematic review was performed of English-language literature published between January 1, 1988, and November 15, 2001. Interventional and observational studies of adults with CFS were eligible if they reported measures of disability and employment. A qualitative synthesis of results relating impairment measures to employment was performed.

Results  Of 3840 studies identified, 37 reported employment status and some measure of mental or physical impairment associated with disability. Most patients with CFS in these studies were unemployed. In 22 studies, the employment status of control subjects was also available. Only depression seemed to be associated with unemployment in patients with CFS. No other measurable impairment seemed to be consistently associated with disability or work outcomes. Only cognitive behavior therapy, rehabilitation, and exercise therapy interventions were associated with restoring the ability to work. No specific patient characteristics were identified as best predictors of positive employment outcomes. No quantitative syntheses of results were performed.

Conclusions  For questions of disability and employment in CFS, the limitations inherent in the current literature are extensive. Methodologically rigorous, longitudinal, and interventional studies are needed to determine baseline characteristics that are associated with the inability to work and interventions that are effective in restoring the ability to work in the CFS population. Simple and consistent evaluations of functional capacity in patients with CFS are needed.

From MetaWorks Inc, Medford, Mass. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Interventions for the treatment, management and rehabilitation of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an updated systematic review.
Chambers et al.
JRSM 2006;99:506-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic fatigue syndrome-like caseness as a predictor of work status in fatigued employees on sick leave: four year follow up study
Huibers et al.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2006;63:570-572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
Hayden et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:427-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How relevant are exercise capacity measures for evaluating treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome? Results from a prospective, multidisciplinary outcome study
Pardaens et al.
Clin Rehabil 2006;20:56-66.
ABSTRACT  

Employment status in chronic fatigue syndrome. A cross-sectional study examining the value of exercise testing and self-reported measures for the assessment of employment status
Nijs et al.
Clin Rehabil 2005;19:895-899.
ABSTRACT