You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 10, May 24, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (81)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Osteoporosis
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Bone Mineral Density Thresholds for Pharmacological Intervention to Prevent Fractures

Ethel S. Siris, MD; Ya-Ting Chen, PhD; Thomas A. Abbott, PhD; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD; Paul D. Miller, MD; Lois E. Wehren, MD; Marc L. Berger, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1108-1112.

Background  Treatment intervention thresholds for prevention of osteoporotic fractures can be derived from reports from the World Health Organization (diagnostic criteria) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (treatment criteria). It is not known how well these thresholds work to identify women who will fracture and are therefore candidates for treatment interventions. We used data from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) to examine the effect of different treatment thresholds on fracture incidence and numbers of women with fractures within the year following bone mineral density measurement.

Methods  The study comprised 149 524 white postmenopausal women aged 50 to 104 years (mean age, 64.5 years). At baseline, bone mineral density was assessed by peripheral bone densitometry at the heel, finger, or forearm. New fractures during the next 12 months were self-reported.

Results  New fractures were reported by 2259 women, including 393 hip fractures; only 6.4% hadbaseline T scores of –2.5 or less (World Health Organization definition for osteoporosis). Although fracture rates were highest in these women, they experienced only 18% of the osteoporotic fractures and 26% of the hip fractures. By National Osteoporosis Foundation treatment guidelines, 22.6% of the women had T scores of 2.0 or less, or –1.5 or less with 1 or more clinical risk factors. Fracture rates were lower, but 45% of osteoporotic fractures and 53% of hip fractures occurred in these women.

Conclusions  Using peripheral measurement devices, 82% of postmenopausal women with fractures had T scores better than –2.5. A strategy to reduce overall fracture incidence will likely require lifestyle changes and a targeted effort to identify and develop treatment protocols for women with less severe low bone mass who are nonetheless at increased risk for future fractures.


From the Toni Stabile Osteoporosis Center, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Siris); Department of Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co Inc, West Point, Pa (Drs Chen, Abbott, and Berger); University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (Dr Barrett-Connor); Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, and University of Colorado, Denver (Dr Miller); and University of Maryland, Baltimore (Dr Wehren). Drs Siris, Barrett-Connor, Miller, and Wehren receive consulting fees from Merck & Co Inc to compensate them for time spent working on the NORA project.


RELATED ARTICLE

Osteoporosis Screening: Time to Take Responsibility
Daniel Mazanec
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1047-1048.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving Evaluation and Treatment for Osteoporosis Following Distal Radial Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Intervention
Rozental et al.
JBJS 2008;90:953-961.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss
Hadji et al.
Ann Oncol 2008;0:mdn164v1-mdn164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Risk Factors for Fracture in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women: A Review of the Recent Literature
LaFleur et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2008;42:375-386.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bone and Fall-Related Fracture Risks in Women and Men with a Recent Clinical Fracture
van Helden et al.
JBJS 2008;90:241-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selecting Patients for Osteoporosis Therapy
SILVERMAN
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1117:264-272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implications Of Expanding Disease Definitions: The Case Of Osteoporosis
Herndon et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1702-1711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women
Cranney et al.
CMAJ 2007;177:575-580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Single-Site vs Multisite Bone Density Measurement for Fracture Prediction
Leslie et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1641-1647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteopenia
Khosla and Melton
NEJM 2007;356:2293-2300.
FULL TEXT  

The Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Screening Tool: A Useful Tool for the Orthopaedic Surgeon
Skedros et al.
JBJS 2007;89:765-772.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identification of post-menopausal women at risk of osteoporosis by trained general dental practitioners using panoramic radiographs
Taguchi et al.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:149-154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Zoledronic Acid Prevents Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Report From the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group
Gnant et al.
JCO 2007;25:820-828.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Zoledronic Acid Inhibits Adjuvant Letrozole-Induced Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer
Brufsky et al.
JCO 2007;25:829-836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for Fracture in Nonosteoporotic Men and Women
Nguyen et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92:955-962.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis and its management
Poole and Compston
BMJ 2006;333:1251-1256.
FULL TEXT  

Fracture Risk (FRISK) Score: Geelong Osteoporosis Study
Henry et al.
Radiology 2006;241:190-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Significance of Bone Density Measurements in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Huang et al.
JBJS 2006;88:1324-1330.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Calcium Supplementation on Clinical Fracture and Bone Structure: Results of a 5-Year, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Elderly Women.
Prince et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:869-875.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteopenia: A Risk Factor that Deserves Some Respect
Siris
IBMS BoneKEy 2005;2:42-44.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Alendronate Therapy for Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women
Schousboe et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:734-741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hip Fracture in Women without Osteoporosis
Wainwright et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:2787-2793.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Population-Based Screening for Celiac Disease: Improvement in Morbidity and Mortality From Osteoporosis?
Buchman
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:370-372.
FULL TEXT  

Bone Mineral Density in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Taveira-DaSilva et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;171:61-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Thresholds for Bone Mineral Density Treatment Be Lowered?
JWatch Gastroenterology 2004;2004:11-11.
FULL TEXT  

Should Thresholds for Bone Mineral Density Treatment Be Lowered?
JWatch General 2004;2004:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis Screening: Time to Take Responsibility
Mazanec
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1047-1048.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.