You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 10, May 24, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Osteoporosis
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

An Approach to Identifying Osteopenic Women at Increased Short-term Risk of Fracture

Paul D. Miller, MD; Suna Barlas, PhD; Susan K. Brenneman, PT, PhD; Thomas A. Abbott, PhD; Ya-Ting Chen, PhD; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD; Ethel S. Siris, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1113-1120.

Background  Identification and management of women to reduce fractures is often limited to T scores less than –2.5, although many fractures occur with higher T scores. We developed a classification algorithm that identifies women with osteopenia (T scores of –2.5 to –1.0) who are at increased risk of fracture within 12 months of peripheral bone density testing.

Methods  A total of 57 421 postmenopausal white women with baseline peripheral T scores of –2.5 to –1.0 and 1-year information on new fractures were included. Thirty-two risk factors for fracture were entered into a classification and regression tree analysis to build an algorithm that best predicted future fracture events.

Results  A total of 1130 women had new fractures in 1 year. Previous fracture, T score at a peripheral site of –1.8 or less, self-rated poor health status, and poor mobility were identified as the most important determinants of short-term fracture. Fifty-five percent of the women were identified as being at increased fracture risk. Women with previous fracture, regardless of T score, had a risk of 4.1%, followed by 2.2% in women with T scores of –1.8 or less or with poor health status, and 1.9% for women with poor mobility. The algorithm correctly classified 74% of the women who experienced a fracture.

Conclusions  This classification tool accurately identified postmenopausal women with peripheral T scores of –2.5 to –1.0 who are at increased risk of fracture within 12 months. It can be used in clinical practice to guide assessment and treatment decisions.


From the Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, and the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver (Dr Miller); the Department of Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co Inc, West Point, Pa (Drs Barlas, Brenneman, Abbott, and Chen); the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla (Dr Barrett-Connor); and the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY (Dr Siris). Drs Miller, Barrett-Connor, and Siris receive consulting fees from Merck & Co Inc to compensate them for time spent working on the NORA project.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Osteoporosis Screening: Time to Take Responsibility
Daniel Mazanec
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1047-1048.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study
Wu et al.
Gut 2008;57:1698-1703.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Bone Biopsy in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure
Miller
CJASN 2008;3:S140-S150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bone and Fall-Related Fracture Risks in Women and Men with a Recent Clinical Fracture
van Helden et al.
JBJS 2008;90:241-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drugs for pre-osteoporosis: prevention or disease mongering?
Alonso-Coello et al.
BMJ 2008;336:126-129.
FULL TEXT  

Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women
Cranney et al.
CMAJ 2007;177:575-580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Framework for Evaluating Disease Severity Measures in Older Adults With Comorbidity
Boyd et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2007;62:286-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for Fracture in Nonosteoporotic Men and Women
Nguyen et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92:955-962.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 55-Year-Old Woman With Osteopenia
Cummings
JAMA 2006;296:2601-2610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alendronate and Vertebral Fracture Risk-1
Mikhail and Cope
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1236-1236.
 

Cost-Effectiveness of Alendronate Therapy for Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women
Schousboe et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:734-741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hip Fracture in Women without Osteoporosis
Wainwright et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:2787-2793.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Four Questions to Determine Fracture Risk in Osteopenic Women
JWatch Women's Health 2004;2004:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Should Thresholds for Bone Mineral Density Treatment Be Lowered?
JWatch Gastroenterology 2004;2004:11-11.
FULL TEXT  

Should Thresholds for Bone Mineral Density Treatment Be Lowered?
JWatch General 2004;2004:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis Screening: Time to Take Responsibility
Mazanec
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1047-1048.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.