You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 10, May 24, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Obesity
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Mammography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Association Between Obesity and Screening Mammography Accuracy

Joann G. Elmore, MD, MPH; Patricia A. Carney, PhD; Linn A. Abraham, MS; William E. Barlow, PhD; Joseph R. Egger, BS; Jessica S. Fosse, MPH; Gary R. Cutter, PhD; R. Edward Hendrick, PhD; Carl J. D'Orsi, MD; Prashni Paliwal, PhC; Stephen H. Taplin, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1140-1147.

Background  Obesity is increasing among American women, especially as they age. The influence of obesity on the accuracy of screening mammography has not been studied extensively.

Methods  We analyzed 100 622 screening mammography examinations performed on members of a nonprofit health plan. The relationship between body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and measures of screening accuracy was assessed. Body mass index was categorized as underweight or normal weight (<25), overweight (25-29), obesity class I (30-34), and obesity classes II to III (>=35).

Results  Compared with underweight or normal weight women, overweight and obese women were more likely to be recalled for additional tests after adjusting for important covariates, including age and breast density (overweight odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.23); obesity class I OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35; obesity classes II-III OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41). As body mass index increased, women were more likely to have lower specificity (overweight OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; obesity class I OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84; and obesity classes II-III OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82). No statistically significant differences were noted in sensitivity. Adjusted receiver operating characteristic analysis showed statistically significant improvement in the area under the curve (AUC) for underweight or normal weight women (AUC = 0.941) vs overweight women (AUC = 0.916, P = .02) and underweight or normal weight women vs obesity classes II and III women (AUC = 0.904, P = .02).

Conclusions  Obese women had more than a 20% increased risk of having false-positive mammography results compared with underweight and normal weight women, although sensitivity was unchanged. Achieving a normal weight may improve screening mammography performance.


From the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center (Dr Elmore, Mr Egger, and Mrs Fosse), and Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative (Drs Elmore, Barlow, and Taplin and Mrs Abraham), Seattle, Wash; Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH (Dr Carney); Center for Research Design and Statistical Methods, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno (Dr Cutter); The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (Dr Hendrick); Breast Imaging Center, Emory Health Care Services, Atlanta, Ga (Dr D'Orsi); and Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs (Mr Paliwal). Dr Taplin is now with the Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md; all opinions are those of the authors and do not imply agreement or endorsement by the federal government of the National Cancer Institute. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Obesity, Mammography Use and Accuracy, and Advanced Breast Cancer Risk
Kerlikowske et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1724-1733.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obesity and the Right Brain
Bachman and Histon
JAMA 2007;298:738-738.
FULL TEXT  

Receipt of Appropriate Primary Breast Cancer Therapy and Adjuvant Therapy Are Not Associated With Obesity in Older Women With Access to Health Care
Buist et al.
JCO 2007;25:3428-3436.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence, Challenges, and Solutions for 18F-FDG PET Studies of Obese Patients: A Technologist's Perspective
Botkin and Osman
J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2007;35:80-83.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Obesity on Image Quality: Fifteen-year Longitudinal Study for Evaluation of Dictated Radiology Reports
Uppot et al.
Radiology 2006;240:435-439.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The influence of statin use on breast density.
Boudreau et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1026-1029.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women
Kerlikowske et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1862-1868.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case-Control and Two-Gate Designs in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Rutjes et al.
Clin. Chem. 2005;51:1335-1341.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.