You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 12, June 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (63)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Bridging Anticoagulation During Interruption of Warfarin

Assessment of a Standardized Periprocedural Anticoagulation Regimen

James D. Douketis, MD, FRCPC; Judith A. Johnson, RN; Alexander G. Turpie, MB, FRCPC

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1319-1326.

Background  The treatment of patients at increased risk for arterial thromboembolism who require temporary interruption of warfarin sodium therapy is a common clinical problem. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a standardized periprocedural anticoagulation regimen with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Methods  We studied 650 consecutive patients with a mechanical heart valve, chronic atrial fibrillation, or embolic stroke who required interruption of warfarin therapy because of an invasive procedure. Warfarin was stopped 5 or 6 days before the procedure, and patients received subcutaneous dalteparin sodium, 100 IU/kg twice daily, starting 3 days before the procedure. The risk of postprocedural bleeding determined postprocedural anticoagulant management. In patients undergoing a non–high-bleeding-risk procedure who had adequate postprocedural hemostasis, warfarin was resumed on the evening of the procedure, and dalteparin sodium, 100 IU/kg twice daily, was resumed on the next day and continued until the international normalized ratio was 2.0 or more. If postprocedural hemostasis was not secured, the resumption of dalteparin was delayed. In patients undergoing a high-bleeding-risk procedure, warfarin was resumed on the evening of the procedure, but dalteparin was not given after the procedure.

Results  Patients were followed up during the preprocedural and postprocedural period for a mean of 13.8 days (range, 10-18 days). In 542 patients who underwent a non–high-bleeding-risk procedure, there were 2 thromboembolic events (0.4%), 4 major bleeding episodes (0.7%), and 32 episodes of increased wound-related blood loss that precluded postprocedural dalteparin administration (5.9%). In 108 patients who underwent a high-bleeding-risk procedure, there were 2 deaths (1.8%) possibly due to thromboembolism and 2 major bleeding episodes (1.8%).

Conclusions  In patients at increased risk for arterial thromboembolism who require temporary interruption of warfarin therapy, a standardized periprocedural anticoagulant regimen with low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with a low risk of thromboembolic and major bleeding complications.


From the Departments of Medicine, McMaster University (Drs Douketis and Turpie and Ms Johnson) and St Joseph's Hospital (Dr Douketis), and Hamilton Health Sciences, General Hospital (Ms Johnson and Dr Turpie), Hamilton, Ontario. Drs Douketis and Turpie have received honoraria for speaking engagements and participation in advisory committees from companies that make low-molecular-weight heparin.


RELATED LETTER

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Bridging Anticoagulation
Carlo J. van Dongen, Roel Vink, and Marcel Levi
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2500.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Douketis et al.
Chest 2008;133:299S-339S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Safety of percutaneous coronary intervention during uninterrupted oral anticoagulant treatment
Karjalainen et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:1001-1010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Developed in Collaboration With the American Socie et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2008;106:685-712.
FULL TEXT  

Can we use a low molecular weight heparin after mechanical prosthetic heart valve surgery?
Meurin and Tabet
Heart 2008;94:131-132.
FULL TEXT  

Enoxaparin as bridging anticoagulant treatment in cardiac surgery
Rivas-Gandara et al.
Heart 2008;94:205-210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Thromboembolism With Short-term Interruption of Warfarin Therapy
Garcia et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:63-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outpatient-Based Primary and Secondary Thromboprophylaxis With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin
Spyropoulos
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 2008;14:63-74.
ABSTRACT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Fleisher et al.
Circulation 2007;116:e418-e499.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Fleisher et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1971-1996.
FULL TEXT  

Implementing anticoagulation management by pharmacists in the inpatient setting
Dager and Gulseth
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1071-1079.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anticoagulants in heart disease: current status and perspectives
De Caterina et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;0:ehl492v1-34.
FULL TEXT  

Brief Communication: Preoperative Anticoagulant Activity after Bridging Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Temporary Interruption of Warfarin
O'Donnell et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:184-187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perioperative management of patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: [Prise en charge perioperatoire des patients traites aux antagonistes de la vitamine K]
Ickx and Steib
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2006;53:S113-S122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Bridging" and Mechanical Heart Valves: Perils, Promises, and Predictions
Goldhaber
Circulation 2006;113:470-472.
FULL TEXT  

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as a Bridging Anticoagulant Early After Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement
Meurin et al.
Circulation 2006;113:564-569.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Bridging On the River Kwai": The Perioperative Management of Anticoagulation Therapy
Eckman
Med Decis Making 2005;25:370-373.
 

Perioperative Management of Patients on Oral Anticoagulants: A Decision Analysis
Dunn et al.
Med Decis Making 2005;25:387-397.
ABSTRACT  

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Bridging Anticoagulation
van Dongen et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2500-2500.
FULL TEXT  

Periprocedure Anticoagulation with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for High-Risk Patients
JWatch Gastroenterology 2004;2004:8-8.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.