This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (37)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Psychosocial Issues  • Cardiovascular System  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Systematic Overview

Farouk Mookadam, MD, FRCPC, MSc(HRM); Heather M. Arthur, PhD, NFESC

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1514-1518.

Among the commonly understood socioeconomic determinants of health, social change, disorganization, and poverty have been associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. One of the postulated mechanisms through which these determinants have been linked to health and illness is their relationship to social support. The health determinant, social isolation or lack of a social support network (SSN), and its effects on premature mortality after acute myocardial infarction mandate further scrutiny by the cardiovascular community for several reasons. First, as a predictor of 1-year mortality, low SSN is equivalent to many of the classic risk factors, such as elevated cholesterol level, tobacco use, and hypertension. Second, treatment of acute myocardial infarction is costly. Because low social support is associated with an increased 1-year mortality, neglecting the role of the SSN may diminish the possible gains accrued during acute-phase treatment. Therefore, lack of an SSN should be considered a risk factor for subsequent morbidity and mortality after a myocardial infarction. Finally, cardiac rehabilitation programs and other extant prevention strategies can be better used to reduce mortality after myocardial infarction. This article systematically reviews recent evidence related to SSNs to provide an update on the role of social support in cardiovascular disease–related outcomes.

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Dr Mookadam); and McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Arthur). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Toward a Restorative Medicine--The Science of Care
Harris
JAMA 2009;301:1710-1712.
FULL TEXT  

Living arrangement and coronary heart disease: the JPHC study
Ikeda et al.
Heart 2009;95:577-583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatric Assessment and Diagnosis in Older Adults
Meeks et al.
Focus 2009;7:3-16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CHAPTER 35 Psychological Factors and Heart Disease
Pedersen et al.
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 2009;2:med-9780199566990-chapter-med-9780199566990-chapter.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Power of Hope
Harris and DeAngelis
JAMA 2008;300:2919-2920.
FULL TEXT  

Pre-Existing Major Depression Predicts In-Hospital Cardiac Complications After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Huffman et al.
Psychosomatics 2008;49:309-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient Satisfaction With Treatment After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Role of Psychosocial Factors
Barry et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2007;69:115-123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic Status and Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Alter et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:82-93.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT