 |
|
Assessment of the Usefulness of Sputum Culture for Diagnosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Using the PORT Predictive Scoring System
Elisa García-Vázquez, MD;
María Angeles Marcos, MD;
José Mensa, MD;
Andrés de Roux, MD;
Jordi Puig, MD;
Carmen Font, MD;
Gloria Francisco, MD;
Antonio Torres, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1807-1811.
Background The usefulness of sputum culture in guiding microbiological diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia is controversial. We evaluate and assess it using the Patients Outcome Research Team (PORT) predictive scoring system.
Methods A cohort of 1669 patients with community-acquired pneumonia was studied. Before administering antibiotic therapy, sputum was collected and its quality evaluated. Samples were gram stained and those of good quality were assessed for a predominant morphotype (PM). Sputum cultures were processed according to standard protocols.
Results A sputum sample was obtained from 983 (59%) of the 1669 patients and 532 (54%) of the samples were of good quality. There was a PM in 240 (45%) of the latter samples (ie, for 14.4% of the 1669 patients) and there was no PM in 292 (55%). Culture yielded a microorganism in 207 (86%) of the 240 samples with PM and 57 (19.5%) of the 292 samples without PM (P<.05). Rates of sputum obtained, good-quality sputum specimens, PM identification, and positive culture were not significantly different among the PORT-score groups of patients (P>.05). The sensitivity and specificity of the gram-positive diplococci identification in the sputum culture of Streptococcus pneumoniae were 60% and 97.6%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 91% and 85.3%, respectively.
Conclusions Good-quality sputum with PM could be obtained in only 14.4% of all patients. A PORT-score group in which sputum could be of greater usefulness in identifying the causative organism could not be identified. The presence of gram-positive diplococci in gram-stained sputum culture was highly specific for S pneumoniae.
From the Departments of Infectious Diseases (Drs García-Vázquez, Mensa, and Font), Microbiology (Drs Marcos and Puig), and Pneumology (Drs de Roux, Francisco, and Torres), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
The Usefulness of Sputum Gram Stain and Culture
Daniel M. Musher
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(4):470-471.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Expectorated Sputum for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Sacred Cow
J. Mark Madison and Richard S. Irwin
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(16):1725-1727.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Evaluation of a Rapid Immunochromatographic ODK0501 Assay for Detecting Streptococcus pneumoniae Antigen in Sputum Samples from Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
Izumikawa et al.
CVI 2009;16:672-678.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adherence to guidelines' empirical antibiotic recommendations and community-acquired pneumonia outcome
Dambrava et al.
Eur Respir J 2008;32:892-901.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Usefulness of Sputum Gram Stain and Culture
Musher
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:470-471.
FULL TEXT
Sputum Culture Is Not Useful for Diagnosing CAP
JWatch Emergency Med. 2004;2004:5-5.
FULL TEXT
The Utility of Sputum Analysis in Patients with CAP
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2004;2004:7-7.
FULL TEXT
Routine Sputum Culture of Questionable Value in Community-Acquired Pneumonia
JWatch General 2004;2004:2-2.
FULL TEXT
Expectorated Sputum for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Sacred Cow
Madison and Irwin
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1725-1727.
FULL TEXT
|
