You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 17, September 27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prospective Study of Social and Other Risk Factors for Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in the Whitehall II Study

Meena Kumari, PhD; Jenny Head, MSc; Michael Marmot, FRCP

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1873-1880.

Background  Social inequalities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes and the relation of health behaviors and psychosocial factors to the incidence of type 2 diabetes are not well established.

Methods  Prospective occupational cohort study of 10 308 civil servants aged 35 to 55 years at baseline in phase 1 (1985-1988). Diagnosis of diabetes was ascertained by questionnaire at baseline and follow-up at phases 2 (1989), 3 (1992-1993), 4 (1995), and 5 (1997-1999) and glucose tolerance tests in phases 3 and 5.

Results  Participants working in the lower employment grades had a higher incidence of diabetes than those in higher employment grades (men: odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-4.4; women: OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 0.8-3.7]). Body mass index and other risk factors considered traditional for type 2 diabetes were found to be so in this cohort. In men, of the psychosocial risk factors examined, only effort-reward imbalance was related to incidence of diabetes (OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0-2.8]). The General Health Questionnaire depression subscale was related to incidence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.0-1.6]). These associations remained after adjustment for other confounding factors. In men only, social difference in incidence of diabetes was reduced but still significant after adjustment for conventional risk factors.

Conclusions  An inverse relationship exists between social position and incidence of diabetes that is partly explained by health behaviors and other risk factors. Effort-reward imbalance, which is reportedly associated with coronary heart disease, is also associated with type 2 diabetes.


From the International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, England. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Association between passive jobs and low levels of leisure-time physical activity: the Whitehall II cohort study
Gimeno et al.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2009;66:772-776.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Social Inequality in Walking Speed in Early Old Age in the Whitehall II Study
Brunner et al.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009;64A:1082-1089.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QDScore
Hippisley-Cox et al.
BMJ 2009;338:b880-b880.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Elevated Levels of the Anti-Inflammatory Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Precede the Onset of Type 2 Diabetes: The Whitehall II Study
Herder et al.
Diabetes Care 2009;32:421-423.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Childhood Socioeconomic Position, Gender, Adult Body Mass Index, and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Over 34 Years in the Alameda County Study
Maty et al.
AJPH 2008;98:1486-1494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Risk in Midadult Life: The Role of Childhood Adversity
Thomas et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e1240-e1249.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does depression increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes?
Cosgrove et al.
Occup Med (Lond) 2008;58:7-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Diabetes Prevalence Between African Americans and Whites of Similar Socioeconomic Status
Signorello et al.
AJPH 2007;97:2260-2267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic status, pathogen burden and cardiovascular disease risk
Steptoe et al.
Heart 2007;93:1567-1570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic Status and Psychological Well-Being Predict Cross-Time Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin in Older Women Without Diabetes
Tsenkova et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2007;69:777-784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective Study of Childhood and Adult Socioeconomic Status and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in Women
Lidfeldt et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:882-889.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Household Wealth and the Metabolic Syndrome in the Whitehall II Study
Perel et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:2694-2700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Type 2 diabetes does not increase risk of depression.
Brown et al.
CMAJ 2006;175:42-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combining Risk Estimates from Observational Studies with Different Exposure Cutpoints: A Meta-analysis on Body Mass Index and Diabetes Type 2
Hartemink et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:1042-1052.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes and cognitive function in a middle-aged cohort: Findings from the Whitehall II study
Kumari and Marmot
Neurology 2005;65:1597-1603.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epidemiological evidence for the role of physical activity in reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease
Bassuk and Manson
J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;99:1193-1204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

History of Depression Increases Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Younger Adults
Brown et al.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:1063-1067.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.