You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 18, October 11, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Psychiatry
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Talking With Terminally Ill Patients and Their Caregivers About Death, Dying, and Bereavement

Is It Stressful? Is It Helpful?

Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD; Diane L. Fairclough, DPH; Pam Wolfe, MS; Linda L. Emanuel, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1999-2004.

Background  Discussing end-of-life issues with terminally ill patients is often considered distressing and harmful. This study was conducted to assess whether interviewing terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement is stressful and/or helpful.

Methods  Patients from 6 sites in the United States who were estimated to have 6 months or less to live were interviewed in person and reinterviewed 2 to 6 months later. Their caregivers were interviewed separately. At the end of the interviews, patients and caregivers were asked how stressful and how helpful the interview had been. Of 1131 eligible patients, 988 (87.4%) were interviewed, and of 915 eligible caregivers, 893 (97.6%) were interviewed.

Results  At the end of the first interview, 1.9% of the patients reported having experienced a great deal of stress, 7.1% some stress, and 88.7% little or no stress from the interview. Among the caregivers, 1.5% reported a great deal of stress, 8.4% some stress, and 89.7% little or no stress. Slightly more stress was reported to have been caused by the reinterview. Overall, 16.9% of the patients reported the initial interview as very helpful, 29.6% as somewhat helpful, and 49.6% as offering little or no help. Among the caregivers, 19.1% reported the initial interview as very helpful, 34.3% as somewhat helpful, and 44.9% as offering little or no help. The reported helpfulness of the second interview was slightly less. Patients experiencing pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.56), more personal meaning in dying (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 2.02-4.59), and less ease with talking about the end of life (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.60) were significantly more likely to report stress. Patients who were from an ethnic minority (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.31-2.63), anxious about the end of their life (OR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.16-1.67), more spiritual (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.61), and serene (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.45) were significantly more likely to report the interview helpful. There was no relationship between stress and helpfulness.

Conclusions  Terminally ill patients and their caregivers can discuss death, dying, and bereavement in a structured interview with minimal stress and report that the interview was helpful. Institutional review boards should not preemptively restrict surveys with terminally ill patients without reliable evidence that they will be stressful or otherwise harmful.


From the Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr E. J. Emanuel); Center for Research Methodology and Biometrics, Cancer Research Center, American Medical Center, Denver, Colo (Dr Fairclough); Wolfe Statistical Consulting, LLC, Denver (Ms Wolfe); and Buehler Center on Aging, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (Dr L. L. Emanuel). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Talking About Death, Dying, and Bereavement With Terminally Ill Patients and Their Caregivers
Leora Schachter
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1437.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Talking About Death, Dying, and Bereavement With Terminally Ill Patients and Their Caregivers —Reply
Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Linda L. Emanuel
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(12):1437.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Researching breathlessness in palliative care: consensus statement of the National Cancer Research Institute Palliative Care Breathlessness Subgroup
Dorman et al.
Palliat Med 2009;23:213-227.
ABSTRACT  

Peaceful Surrender to Death Without Futile Bargaining to Live Relieves Terminal Air Hunger and Anguish
Das et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2009;25:496-499.
ABSTRACT  

End-of-Life Care: Findings From a National Survey of Informal Caregivers
Wolff et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:40-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Talking About Death, Dying, and Bereavement With Terminally Ill Patients and Their Caregivers
Schachter
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1437-1437.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.