You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 19, October 25, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Antibiotics for the Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Brian J. Wells, MD; Arch G. Mainous III, PhD; Lori M. Dickerson, PharmD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2156-2161.

Background  Infections have been suspected in the pathogenesis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) for more than 100 years. Chlamydia pneumoniae has been identified in atherosclerotic specimens, and in some studies antibody titers to C pneumoniae have been related to the risk of myocardial infarction. The numerous clinical trials that have studied the use of antibiotics in the secondary prevention of IHD have had conflicting results.

Methods  This study is a meta-analysis of the published randomized controlled trials on the secondary prevention of IHD with antibiotics. Studies included in the analysis were limited to those studies that used antibiotics effective against C pneumoniae, enrolled patients with known IHD, and examined clinical outcomes related to IHD. Inclusion in the analysis was limited to well-designed randomized controlled trials that met inclusion criteria established by an expert panel.

Results  Nine published studies, with a total of 11 015 participants, were identified that met the criteria for this meta-analysis. Four of the studies reported a benefit from antibiotics, whereas 5 found no effect. A funnel plot of the published studies did not suggest the existence of other unpublished data. The combined effect found no benefit from antibiotics in the prevention of cardiovascular events in subjects with known IHD (relative risk, 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.03]) or mortality (relative risk, 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.12]).

Conclusion  In patients with known IHD, macrolide antibiotics for C pneumoniae did not result in a statistically significant reduction in recurrent cardiac events or mortality over 3 months to 3 years.


Author Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
Baker and Couch
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:830-836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Potential New Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke: What Is Their Potential?
Hankey
Stroke 2006;37:2181-2188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serum Enterolactone Concentration and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in a Case-Cohort Study of Finnish Male Smokers
Kilkkinen et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:687-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The failure of antibiotics to prevent heart attacks
Taylor-Robinson and Boman
BMJ 2005;331:361-362.
FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia pneumoniae and Acute Coronary Syndrome
Wong et al.
NEJM 2005;353:525-528.
FULL TEXT  

Empirical Antibiotics for Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2004;2004:9-9.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.