 |
|
Can We Ensure That All Research Subjects Give Valid Consent?
David Wendler, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2201-2204.
To ensure that research subjects provide valid consent, most commentators direct clinical investigators to formally assess potential subjects who are at increased risk for lacking the capacity to consent. Current data reveal, however, that subjects with no known cognitive impairments often fail to give valid consent. These data imply that the prevailing focus on individuals’ capacity to consent is too narrow. To protect subjects, as well as the integrity of clinical research, the actual consent of all subjects should be formally assessed. Recent development of several preliminary consent assessment tools suggests that, in addition to being ethically preferable, with additional research this approach may be practically feasible. Future research should focus on developing a postdecision questionnaire that can be adapted to individual studies and used to assess the voluntariness and understanding of all research subjects.
Author Affiliation: Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The ethics of sham invasive intervention trials
Miller and Wendler
Clin Trials 2009;6:401-402.
Surrogate Consent for Genomics Research in Intensive Care
Shelton et al.
Am J Crit Care 2009;18:418-426.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Understanding of Placebo Controls Among Older People With Schizophrenia
Dunn et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:137-146.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Keep people informed or leave them alone? A suggested tool for identifying research participants who rightly want only limited information
Eriksson and Helgesson
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:674-678.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
