You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 20, November 8, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Impact of Diabetes on Mortality in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Alvaro M. Murcia, MD; Charles H. Hennekens, MD, DrPH; Gervasio A. Lamas, MD; Manuel Jiménez-Navarro, MD; Jean L. Rouleau, MD; Greg C. Flaker, MD; Steven Goldman, MD, DrPH; Hicham Skali, MD; Eugene Braunwald, MD; Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2273-2279.

Background  Diabetes is a major risk factor for developing coronary heart disease. In patients with diabetes who survived myocardial infarction (MI), less is known about subsequent morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the effects of diabetes in post-MI patients with left ventricular dysfunction on cardiovascular events and death.

Methods  The Survival and Ventricular Enlargement, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial, evaluated the efficacy of captopril vs placebo in 2231 patients following acute MI with left ventricular dysfunction defined as an ejection fraction less than or equal to 40%. Patients were randomly assigned to captopril or placebo 3 to 16 days following MI and were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean, 3.5 years).

Results  Among the 2231, 496 (22.2%) were patients with a history of diabetes, of which 168 (33.9%) were treated with insulin. Patients with diabetes were significantly older; more likely to be women; have a history of prior MI or hypertension; be obese or manifest Killip class II or greater; and have higher systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and heart rate, as well as lower ejection fraction. During follow-up, 31.3% of patients with diabetes and 20.1% of nondiabetic patients died (P<.001). Furthermore, 50% of the patients with diabetes had at least 1 major cardiovascular event compared with 32.3% among the nondiabetic patients (P<.001). In multivariate analysis that adjusted for all significant differences in baseline characteristics, patients with diabetes had a 39% higher total mortality (P = .001) and 49% more cardiovascular events (P = .001). Among the patients with diabetes, baseline insulin treatment was associated with a greater risk of death (41.1% vs 26.2%; P = .001) and cardiovascular events (58.3% vs 45.7%; P = .008).

Conclusions  In patients who survived MI with left ventricular dysfunction, diabetes increased risk of death from all causes even after controlling for differences in other risk factors. Patients with diabetes treated with insulin have a particularly higher mortality risk. Patients with diabetes who survived MI with left ventricular dysfunction, in particular those receiving insulin, are at high risk of subsequent mortality and cardiovascular events and thus require intensive risk factor modification, as well as evaluation for novel therapies.


Author Affiliations: Mount Sinai Medical Center & Miami Heart Institute (Drs Murcia and Lamas) and Agatston Research Institute (Dr Hennekens), Miami Beach, Fla; University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (Drs Hennekens and Lamas); Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (Dr Jiménez-Navarro); Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Rouleau); University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics, Columbia (Dr Flaker); Tucson VA Hospital, Tucson, Ariz (Dr Goldman); and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Drs Skali, Braunwald, and Pfeffer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Benefit and Risk of Antidiabetic Agents Used in Patients With Heart Disease
Cheng et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2009;22:179-193.
ABSTRACT  

Diastolic Stiffness of the Failing Diabetic Heart: Importance of Fibrosis, Advanced Glycation End Products, and Myocyte Resting Tension
van Heerebeek et al.
Circulation 2008;117:43-51.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interaction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Preconditioning, and Postconditioning
Ferdinandy et al.
Pharmacol. Rev. 2007;59:418-458.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High levels of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide are associated with ST resolution failure after reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction
Lorgis et al.
QJM 2007;100:211-216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence and Risk Factors for Stroke in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: The DAI Study
Giorda et al.
Stroke 2007;38:1154-1160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is intensive insulin therapy safe in the critically ill?
Rady et al.
Chest 2006;130:1278-1281.
FULL TEXT  

Association between plasma levels of heat shock protein 60 and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus
Shamaei-Tousi et al.
Eur Heart J 2006;27:1565-1570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.