You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 22, Dec 13/27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Observation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Medical vs Surgical Management of Spinal Epidural Abscess

Farhan Siddiq, MBBS; Ashish Chowfin, MBBS, DTM&H; Robert Tight, MD; Abe E. Sahmoun, PhD; Raymond A. Smego, Jr, MD, MPH, FRCP, DTM&H

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2409-2412.

Background  We compared the clinical features and outcomes of patients with spinal epidural abscess treated with prolonged parenteral antibiotics alone or combined with computed tomography–guided percutaneous needle aspiration drainage with those of patients undergoing surgical decompression.

Methods  A retrospective analysis of 57 cases of spinal epidural abscess treated at an academic teaching hospital during a 14-year period.

Results  The lumbar region was most frequently involved, and 46% of patients were immunocompromised. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently encountered pathogen. For 60 treatment courses, management included medical only (25 patients), medical plus computed tomography–guided percutaneous needle aspiration (7 patients), or surgical drainage approaches (28 patients). Prolonged use of parenteral antibiotics alone or combined with percutaneous needle drainage yielded clinical outcomes at least comparable with antibiotics plus surgical intervention, irrespective of patient age, presence of comorbid illness, disease onset, neurologic abnormality at time of presentation, or abscess size.

Conclusion  Patients with spinal epidural abscess can be safely and effectively treated with conservative medical treatment without the need for surgery.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo. Dr Smego is currently with the Tuberculosis Research Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cervical spondylodiscitis with spinal epidural abscess caused by Aggregatibacter aphrophilus
Pasqualini et al.
J Med Microbiol 2008;57:652-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice
Sendi et al.
QJM 2008;101:1-12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Follow-Up MR Imaging in Patients with Pyogenic Spine Infections: Lack of Correlation with Clinical Features
Kowalski et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2007;28:693-699.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spinal Epidural Abscess
de Letona et al.
NEJM 2007;356:638-639.
FULL TEXT  

Spinal Epidural Abscess
Darouiche
NEJM 2006;355:2012-2020.
FULL TEXT  

Extensive S aureus spinal epidural empyema.
Sagar et al.
Neurology 2005;65:1970-1970.
FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic Abscess Penetration: Fosfomycin Levels Measured in Pus and Simulated Concentration-Time Profiles
Sauermann et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4448-4454.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spinal Epidural Abscess: Is Medical Management as Good as Surgery?
JWatch Neurology 2005;2005:10-10.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.