This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (14)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured  • Health Policy  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Physicians' Views

Danny McCormick, MD, MPH; David U. Himmelstein, MD; Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH; David H. Bor, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:300-304.

Background  Forty-one million Americans have no health insurance and, despite the growth of managed care, medical costs are again increasing rapidly. One proposed solution is a single-payer health care financing system with universal coverage. Yet, physicians' views of such a system have not been well studied.

Methods  We surveyed a random sample of physicians (from the American Medical Association Masterfile) in Massachusetts, regarding their views on a single-payer health care financing system and other financing and physician work-life issues that such a system might affect.

Results  Of 1787 physicians, 904 (50.6%) responded to our survey. When asked which structure would provide the best care for the most people for a fixed amount of money, 63.5% of physicians chose a single-payer system; 10.7%, managed care; and 25.8%, a fee-for-service system. Only 51.9% believed that most physician colleagues would support a single-payer system. Most respondents would give up income to reduce paperwork, agree that it is government's responsibility to ensure the provision of medical care, believe that insurance firms should not play a major role in health care delivery, and would prefer to work under a salary system.

Conclusions  Most physicians in Massachusetts, a state with a high managed care penetration, believe that single-payer financing of health care with universal coverage would provide the best care for the most people, compared with a managed care or fee-for-service system. Physicians' advocacy of single-payer national health insurance could catalyze a renewed push for its adoption.

From the Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

A Single-Payer National Health Insurance: We Gave Twice at the Office
Alexander C. Chester
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1702.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Single-Payer National Health Insurance: We Gave Twice at the Office
Alexander C. Chester
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(20):2281.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Danger of Single-Payer Health Insurance
Donald J. Palmisano
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(20):2281-2282.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Single-Payer National Health Insurance: We Gave Twice at the Office
Chester
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2281-2281.
FULL TEXT  

The Danger of Single-Payer Health Insurance
Palmisano
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2281-2282.
FULL TEXT  

When Most Doctors Are Women: What Lies Ahead?
Levinson and Lurie
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:471-474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Single-Payer National Health Insurance: We Gave Twice at the Office
Chester
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1702-1702.
FULL TEXT  

Lack of National Primary Care Organization Partnerships With Community Groups to Promote Health Care Reform
Schlaff
AJPH 2005;95:832-834.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT