You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 6, March 22, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Effects of Health Maintenance Organization Coverage of Self-monitoring Devices on Diabetes Self-care and Glycemic Control

Stephen B. Soumerai, ScD; Connie Mah, MS; Fang Zhang, MS; Alyce Adams, PhD; Mary Barton, MD, MPP; Vera Fajtova, MD; Dennis Ross-Degnan, ScD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:645-652.

Background  Increasingly, government mandates require insurance coverage of blood glucose monitors and test strips for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. No data exist on the effects of such coverage on self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), medication compliance, or blood glucose control. We evaluated whether a policy providing free blood glucose monitors increased SMBG and whether initiating SMBG was associated with increased regularity of medication use and improved glucose control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level).

Methods  Using interrupted time-series analysis and controlling for preintervention trends, we determined changes in rates of SMBG 2 years before and after the policy among 3219 continuously enrolled patients with diabetes receiving drug therapy within a multispecialty medical group (part of a health maintenance organization) serving approximately 300 000 patients. We also compared changes over time in regularity of medication use (mean days between dispensings) and mean HbA1c level among initiators and noninitiators of SMBG.

Results  The policy resulted in a small, significant increase in SMBG among insulin-treated patients (n = 1428). Among sulfonylurea-treated patients (n = 1791), the monthly initiation rate of SMBG increased by 14 new patients per 1000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10 to 17), a doubling of the expected initiation rate. Test strip consumption increased during the first 6 months after the policy by 17.9 strips per cohort member (75% relative increase by 6 months; 95% CI, 50% to 101%). Compared with noninitiators of SMBG, initiators (n = 593) showed sudden, significant improvements in regularity of medication use by 6 months after initiation (-19.5 days between dispensings among those with low refill regularity [95% CI, -27.7 to -11.3]; -9.7 days among those with moderate regularity [95% CI, -12.3 to -7.1]), and in glucose control (-0.63% mean HbA1c level [as percentage of total hemoglobin] among those with poor baseline glycemic control [HbA1c >10%; 95% CI, -1.14% to -0.12%]).

Conclusions  Providing free glucose monitors improved rates of self-monitoring in this health maintenance organization population, possibly by offering an initial incentive for patients to engage in more desirable patterns of care. Initiating SMBG was associated with increased regularity of medication use and a reduction in high blood glucose levels.


From the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Drs Soumerai, Adams, Barton, and Ross-Degnan and Ms Mah and Mr Zhang), and the Endocrine-Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (Dr Fajtova), Boston, Mass. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial
O'Kane et al.
BMJ 2008;336:1174-1177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Patient Blood Glucose Monitoring Improve Diabetes Control?: A Systematic Review of the Literature
McAndrew et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2007;33:991-1010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Foundation of Diabetes Self-management: Glucose Monitoring
Banerji
The Diabetes Educator 2007;33:87S-90S.
FULL TEXT  

Is Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Appropriate for All Type 2 Diabetic Patients?: The Fremantle Diabetes Study
Davis et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:1764-1770.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Glycemia in Diabetes Using Self-monitoring Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c
Saudek et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1688-1697.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Failure of Internet-based audit and feedback to improve quality of care delivered by primary care residents
Simon and Soumerai
Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:427-431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Not Using Insulin: A systematic review
Welschen et al.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:1510-1517.
FULL TEXT  

Counterpoint: Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetic Patients not Receiving Insulin: A waste of money
Davidson
Diabetes Care 2005;28:1531-1533.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.