You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 6, March 22, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Lack of Physician Concordance With Guidelines on the Perioperative Use of {beta}-Blockers

Anita K. Siddiqui, MD; Shahid Ahmed, MD; Henri Delbeau, MD; David Conner, MD; Joseph Mattana, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:664-667.

Background  The American College of Physicians recommends perioperative use of {beta}-blockers for certain patients to improve outcomes after surgery. Study of physician behavior with respect to guidelines and recommended practices have shown that {beta}-blockers have been underutilized after myocardial infarction. We evaluated physician concordance with the perioperative use of {beta}-blockers along with a specialty-related difference in the frequency of perioperative {beta}-blocker use.

Methods  To determine perioperative use of {beta}-blockers, we retrospectively analyzed the medical charts of adult patients who underwent open cholecystectomy at a tertiary care medical center from December 1997 through December 2001. Patients met criteria for perioperative {beta}-blocker use if they had a history of coronary artery disease or if they had the presence of 2 or more of the following risk factors: 65 years or older; history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or hypercholesterolemia; or current smoking.

Results  Among the 336 cases of cholecystectomy reviewed, criteria for {beta}-blocker use were met in 146 patients (43%) who did not have emergency operations and/or contraindications to {beta}-blocker use. Of these 146 patients, 123 (84%) had a documented preoperative medical evaluation by a physician in the medical chart. There were 44 patients (30%) receiving {beta}-blockers prior to admission, and 102 patients (70%) were not receiving {beta}-blockers. Of those 102 patients not receiving {beta}-blockers at admission but who meet criteria for their use, 94 (92%) were not started on {beta}-blocker therapy preoperatively. Of the 18 patients evaluated by a cardiologist, 4 (22%) were started on {beta}-blocker therapy compared with 3 (6%) of 47 patients evaluated by a noncardiologist physician (P = .08).

Conclusion  Perioperative {beta}-blocker therapy is underutilized in patients with risk factors for coronary artery disease despite evidence that its use in appropriate individuals may be lifesaving.


From the Department of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, the Long Island Campus for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED LETTERS

Resistance to Use of Perioperative {beta}-Blockers: A No-Man’s Land
Avishay Grupper and Mayer Brezis
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(3):347.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Alternative View of Current Evidence in Support of Perioperative {beta}-Blockers
W. Scott Beattie, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, and Peter T. Choi
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(3):347-348.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are {beta}-Blockers Useful to Protect High-Risk Patients Scheduled for Open Cholecystectomy?
Emmanuel Marret and Pierre Albaladejo
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(3):348.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are {beta}-Blockers Useful to Protect High-Risk Patients Scheduled for Open Cholecystectomy?—Reply
Shahid Ahmed, Anita K. Siddiqui, Henri Delbeau, and Joseph Mattana
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(3):348-349.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perioperative Medical Comorbidities in the Orthopaedic Patient
Bushnell et al.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:216-227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of perioperative beta blockade in patients with diabetes undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: randomised placebo controlled, blinded multicentre trial.
Juul et al.
BMJ 2006;332:1482-1482.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism and coronary events: differential responsiveness to an intervention program to improve guidelines adherence
Grupper et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:123-126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing and Reducing the Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery
Auerbach and Goldman
Circulation 2006;113:1361-1376.
FULL TEXT  

Resistance to Use of Perioperative {beta}-Blockers: A No-Man's Land
Grupper and Brezis
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:347-347.
FULL TEXT  

Are {beta}-Blockers Useful to Protect High-Risk Patients Scheduled for Open Cholecystectomy?
Marret and Albaladejo
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:348-348.
FULL TEXT  

An Alternative View of Current Evidence in Support of Perioperative {beta}-Blockers
Beattie et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:347-348.
FULL TEXT  

Are {beta}-Blockers Useful to Protect High-Risk Patients Scheduled for Open Cholecystectomy?--Reply
Ahmed et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:348-349.
FULL TEXT  

Expert consensus document on {beta}-adrenergic receptor blockers: The Task Force on Beta-Blockers of the European Society of Cardiology
Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2004;25:1341-1362.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.