You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 7, April 12, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Use of {beta}-Blockers in a Tertiary Care Heart Failure Clinic

Dosing, Tolerance, and Outcomes

Puneeta Tandon, MD; Finlay A. McAlister, MD, MSc; Ross T. Tsuyuki, PharmD, MSc; Marilou Hervas-Malo, MSc; Ruth Dupuit, BSc; Justin Ezekowitz, MD; Bibiana Cujec, MD; Paul W. Armstrong, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:769-774.

Background  Little is known about the dosing, tolerability, and impact of {beta}-blockers in nontrial participants. This study was conducted to evaluate the use and outcomes of {beta}-blockers in a tertiary care heart failure clinic.

Methods  Analysis of prospectively collected data from a cohort of 1041 patients with heart failure seen at the University of Alberta Heart Function Clinic, Edmonton, from September 1, 1989, through July 1, 2001, with objective measurement of ejection fraction at baseline and prospective collection of data at all subsequent clinic visits.

Results  Median age at baseline was 69 years; 65% were male; 75% had systolic dysfunction; mean ejection fraction was 33%; and 51% had New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms. Median duration of follow-up was 32 months (interquartile range, 13-62 months). Overall, 46% of patients received {beta}-blockers, but only 18% of these were ultimately prescribed the dosages achieved in the trials (mean maximum dosages achieved, 27 mg/d for carvedilol and 81 mg/d for metoprolol tartrate). Of those patients prescribed {beta}-blockers, 74% continued to receive them during follow-up. Blood pressure, heart rate, and failure symptomatology did not change appreciably before and after {beta}-blockers were prescribed, or during the upward titration of the dosage. Although our patients were prescribed lower dosages than those used in trials, Cox multivariate regression revealed that {beta}-blockers were associated with improved survival, even after adjusting for potential confounders including New York Heart Association class, year of prescription, and concomitant medication use (relative risk, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.81).

Conclusions  The benefits of {beta}-blockers seen in randomized trials extend to nontrial participants treated in a tertiary care clinic specializing in heart failure. In our cohort of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, {beta}-blockers were well tolerated.


From the Division of General Internal Medicine (Drs Tandon and McAlister), the Epidemiology Coordinating and Research Centre (Drs McAlister and Tsuyuki and Mss Hervas-Malo and Dupuit), and the Division of Cardiology (Drs Tsuyuki, Ezekowitz, Cujec, and Armstrong), University of Alberta, Edmonton. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How many patients with heart failure are eligible for cardiac resynchronization? Insights from two prospective cohorts
McAlister et al.
Eur Heart J 2006;27:323-329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beta-Blocker Use in a Heart-Failure Clinic
Journal Watch Cardiology 2004;2004:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.