You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 7, April 12, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction

The Worcester Heart Attack Study

Elizabeth A. Jackson, MD, MPH; Jorge L. Yarzebski, MD, MPH; Robert J. Goldberg, PhD; Brownell Wheeler, MD; Jerry H. Gurwitz, MD; Darleen M. Lessard, MS; Susanna E. Bedell, MD; Joel M. Gore, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:776-783.

Background  Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in Americans. Despite increased interest in end-of-life care, data regarding the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in acutely ill cardiac patients remain extremely limited. The objectives of this study were to describe use of DNR orders, treatment approaches, and hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods  The study sample consisted of 4621 residents hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction at all metropolitan Worcester, Mass, area hospitals in five 1-year periods from 1991 to 1999.

Results  Significant increases in the use of DNR orders were observed during the study decade (from 16% in 1991 to 25% in 1999). The elderly, women, and patients with previous diabetes mellitus or stroke were more likely to have DNR orders. Patients with DNR orders were significantly less likely to be treated with effective cardiac medications, even if the DNR order occurred late in the hospital stay. Less than 1% of patients were noted to have DNR orders before hospital admission. Patients with DNR orders were significantly more likely to die during hospitalization than patients without DNR orders (44% vs 5%).

Conclusions  The results of this community-wide study suggest increased use of DNR orders in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction during the past decade. Use of certain cardiac therapies and hospital outcomes are different between patients with and without DNR orders. Further efforts are needed to characterize the use of DNR orders in patients with acute coronary disease.


From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (Drs Jackson, Yarzebski, Goldberg, and Gore and Ms Lessard), and the Department of Surgery (Dr Wheeler), University of Massachusetts Medical School, and Meyers Primary Care Institute (Drs Goldberg and Gurwitz), Worcester; and the Lown Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Brookline, Mass (Dr Bedell). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Early care limitations independently predict mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage
Zahuranec et al.
Neurology 2007;68:1651-1657.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

'Do not resuscitate' decisions in continuing care psychiatric patients: what influences decisions?
Chakraborty and Creaney
Psychiatr. Bull. 2006;30:376-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.