You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 8, April 26, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of the Effects of Raloxifene and Conjugated Equine Estrogen on Bone and Lipids in Healthy Postmenopausal Women

Ian R. Reid, MD; Richard Eastell, MD; Ignac Fogelman, MD; Jonathon D. Adachi, MD; Amy Rosen, MS; Coen Netelenbos, MD, PhD; Nelson B. Watts, MD; Ego Seeman, MD; Angelina V. Ciaccia, PhD; Michael W. Draper, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:871-879.

Background  Although many studies have assessed the effects of estrogen and raloxifene hydrochloride on bone mineral density and serum lipid concentrations, there are few direct comparative data.

Methods  Randomized placebo-controlled trial for 3 years, intention-to-treat analysis. Six hundred nineteen postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy (mean age, 53.0 years) were studied in 38 centers in Europe, North America, Australasia, and South Africa. They were randomized to 60 mg/d or 150 mg/d of raloxifene, 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), or placebo. Bone density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and fasting serum lipid concentrations were assessed for 3 years.

Results  Compared with baseline, bone density in the lumbar spine progressively declined by 2.0% in the placebo group (P <.05), was stable in the 2 raloxifene groups, and increased 4.6% in the subjects receiving CEE (P <.001). Effects in both raloxifene groups were different from those observed in the CEE and placebo groups (P <.001). Bone density in the total hip showed similar results. Conjugated equine estrogen produced significantly greater depression of serum osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and urine C-telopeptide, compared with raloxifene. Each of the active treatments caused comparable depression of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol below placebo levels (P <.001 at most time points). Raloxifene did not affect high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, whereas CEE increased it by 13.4% compared with placebo at 3 years (P <.001). Triglyceride concentrations increased 24.6% in the CEE group at 3 years (P <.003), a significantly greater change than in the raloxifene groups, which were 4.9% and 8.0% above baseline (P <=.002) but not different from placebo. Urinary incontinence was reported in 11 women receiving CEE, but in only 1 or 2 in each of the other groups (P <=.01 compared with the other groups). Hernias occurred less frequently in those receiving 150 mg/d of raloxifene or CEE (P = .03 vs placebo).

Conclusions  Raloxifene and CEE have beneficial effects on bone density and bone turnover, although effects of CEE are more marked. Raloxifene and CEE produce different patterns of lipid responses and have distinct adverse effect profiles.


Author affiliations are given at the end of the article. Drs Reid, Eastell, Fogelman, Adachi, Netelenbos, Watts, and Seeman have served as consultants for or received research funding from Eli Lilly and Company.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical Management of Asymptomatic Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop
Khan et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;94:373-381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Bone Density or Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Qaseem et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:404-415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 10-year follow-up of the effect of continuous-combined hormone replacement therapy and its discontinuation on bone in postmenopausal women
Heikkinen et al.
Menopause Int 2008;14:70-77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in Men and Women with Low Bone Density or Osteoporosis
MacLean et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:197-213.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perspectives on Dyslipidemia and Coronary Heart Disease in Women
Bittner
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1628-1635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

TRL, IDL, and LDL Apolipoprotein B-100 and HDL Apolipoprotein A-I Kinetics as a Function of Age and Menopausal Status
Matthan et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2005;25:1691-1696.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Effects of Estrogen and Raloxifene on Messenger RNA and Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Activity in the Rat Uterus
Helvering et al.
Biol. Reprod. 2005;72:830-841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.