This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (15)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Susan M. Rhee, BS; Vinod K. Garg, MD; Charles O. Hershey, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1004-1009.

Background  Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) include a number of different modalities to improve health. The popularity of such healing methods has increased, although reports of problems and adverse effects have also increased. Difficulties have also been identified in communication between patients and their providers. Previous reports concerning CAM may have undersampled lower socioeconomic groups as a result of the telephone survey techniques used.

Methods  All patients with valid appointments for internal medicine resident teaching clinics at 2 publicly supported centers were considered for eligibility. Patients were surveyed about current medications and a variety of CAM modalities. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information and to confirm diagnoses, allergies, medications, and any documented adverse effects.

Results  Use of CAM was common by 85.4% of patients, including those using some form of diet, exercise, and prayer. A smaller number (32.3%) were currently using alternate health care providers and products. About 5% of the population used 6 products or more. Use by this primarily poor urban population appeared similar to that in previous reports, with some exceptions. Expensive modalities were less frequently used, whereas use of prayer appears more prevalent.

Conclusions  Complementary and alternate medical modalities are as commonly used by poor urban populations as by the general population. Quantification of use depends on the types of CAM used and the time frame asked. Although much of the use does not appear to be maladaptive, a small percentage of individuals have enthusiastically adapted CAM in ways that would not be endorsed by most allopathic physicians.

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors associated with dietary supplement use among prescription medication users.
Gardiner et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1968-1974.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among California Adults With and Without Cancer
Goldstein et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2005;2:557-565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT