You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 9, May 10, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Men's Health
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Good and Bad Dying From the Perspective of Terminally Ill Men

Elizabeth K. Vig, MD, MPH; Robert A. Pearlman, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:977-981.

Background  Understanding the range of patients' views about good and bad deaths may be useful to clinicians caring for terminally ill patients. Our current understanding of good and bad deaths, however, comes primarily from input from families and clinicians. This study aimed to learn how terminally ill men conceptualize good and bad deaths.

Methods  We conducted semistructured interviews with 26 men identified as having terminal heart disease or cancer. Participants described good and bad deaths in a section of open-ended questions. Participants also answered closed-ended questions about specific end-of-life scenarios. The open-ended questions were tape recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using grounded theory methods. The closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results  We found heterogeneity in responses to questions about good deaths, bad deaths, and preferred dying experiences. Participants voiced multiple reasons for why dying in one's sleep led to a good death and why prolonged dying or suffering led to a bad death. Participants did not hold uniform views about the presence of others at the very end of life or preferred location of dying.

Conclusions  In discussing the end of life with terminally ill patients, clinicians may want to identify not only their patients' views of good and bad deaths but also how the identified attributes contribute to a good or bad death. The discussion can then focus on what might interfere with patients' attainment of their preferred dying experience and what may be available to help them achieve a death that is most consistent with their wishes.


From the Department of Medicine and Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (Drs Vig and Pearlman); and Geriatrics and Extended Care (Dr Vig) and Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (Dr Pearlman), Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED LETTER

Good and Bad Dying: Armed Forces Physician Perspectives
Kuldip Anand, Ajit Kashyap, and Pitambar Prusty
Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(22):2502.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Quality of Dying and Death
Hales et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:912-918.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making.
Rietjens et al.
Palliat Med 2006;20:685-692.
ABSTRACT  

Good and Bad Dying: Armed Forces Physician Perspectives
Anand et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2502-2502.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.