 |
|
Granted, Undecided, Withdrawn, and Refused Requests for Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide, MSc;
Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, PhD;
Gerrit van der Wal, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1698-1704.
Background The aims of this study were to obtain information about the characteristics of requests for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and to distinguish among different types of situations that can arise between the request and the physician’s decision.
Methods All general practitioners in 18 of the 23 Dutch general practitioner districts received a written questionnaire in which they were asked to describe the most recent request for EAS they received.
Results A total of 3614 general practitioners responded to the questionnaire (response rate, 60%). Of all explicit requests for EAS, 44% resulted in EAS. In the other cases the patient died before the performance (13%) or finalization of the decision making (13%), the patient withdrew the request (13%), or the physician refused the request (12%). Patients’ most prominent symptoms were "feeling bad," "tiredness," and "lack of appetite." The most frequently mentioned reasons for requesting EAS were "pointless suffering," "loss of dignity," and "weakness." The patients’ situation met the official requirements for accepted practice best in requests that resulted in EAS and least in refused requests. A lesser degree of competence and less unbearable and hopeless suffering had the strongest associations with the refusal of a request.
Conclusions The complexity of EAS decision making is reflected in the fact that besides granting and refusing a request, 3 other situations could be distinguished. The decisions physicians make, the reasons they have for their decisions, and the way they arrived at their decisions seem to be based on patient evaluations. Physicians report compliance with the official requirements for accepted practice.
Author Affiliations: Department of Public and Occupational Health/Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
RELATED LETTER
"Agreed Boundaries": Are We Asking the Right Question?
Samia A. Hurst
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):126-127.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Assessing Physician Compliance With the Rules for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Susan M. Wolf
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(15):1677-1679.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Dealing With Delicate Issues in Continuous Deep Sedation: Varying Practices Among Dutch Medical Specialists, General Practitioners, and Nursing Home Physicians
Hasselaar et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:537-543.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in "vulnerable" groups
Battin et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:591-597.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Discrepancies in the Viewpoints of Different German Health Care Providers on Palliative Care
Schneider et al.
Eval Health Prof 2007;30:96-109.
ABSTRACT
"Agreed Boundaries": Are We Asking the Right Question?
Hurst
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:126-127.
FULL TEXT
Assessing Physician Compliance With the Rules for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Wolf
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1677-1679.
FULL TEXT
|
