You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 15, Aug 8/22, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Regional and Institutional Variation in the Initiation of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders

David S. Zingmond, MD, PhD; Neil S. Wenger, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1705-1712.

Background  Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are an important step in decision making about aggressiveness of care for patients in hospitals. The use of DNR orders is known to vary with patient characteristics, but few studies have investigated the role of hospital factors or of regional variation. We examined these influences on the use of early DNR orders (written <24 hours after admission).

Methods  We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients 50 years and older admitted to acute-care hospitals in California in 2000 from the most prevalent medical and surgical diagnosis related groups. We performed multivariate logistic regression predicting use of DNR by hospital characteristics while accounting for patient characteristics, and estimated indirectly standardized rates of DNR use by county.

Results  In the selected diagnosis related groups, 819 686 persons were admitted to 386 hospitals. Early DNR orders varied from 2% (patients aged 50-59 years) to 17% (patients aged ≥80 years). In multivariate analyses, the odds of having early DNR orders written were significantly lower in for-profit (vs private nonprofit) hospitals, higher in the smallest (vs the largest) hospitals, and lower in academic (vs nonacademic) hospitals. Standardized rates of DNR order use varied 10-fold across counties. The highest rates were among patients from rural areas. However, variation in use did not correspond well to county population, hospital bed availability, or population density.

Conclusions  Hospital characteristics appear to be associated with the use of DNR orders, even after accounting for differences in patient characteristics. This association reflects institutional culture, technological bent, and physician practice patterns. If these factors do not match patient preferences, then improvements in care are needed.


Author Affiliations: Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Organ Procurement After Cardiocirculatory Death: A Critical Analysis
Rady et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2008;23:303-312.
ABSTRACT  

Mortality as a Measure of Quality: Implications for Palliative and End-of-Life Care
Holloway and Quill
JAMA 2007;298:802-804.
FULL TEXT  

Early care limitations independently predict mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage
Zahuranec et al.
Neurology 2007;68:1651-1657.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Place of Death After Stroke--United States, 1999-2002
JAMA 2006;295:2717-2718.
FULL TEXT  

Bridging the Continuum: Nutrition Support in Palliative and Hospice Care
Fuhrman and Herrmann
Nutr Clin Pract 2006;21:134-141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.