 |
|
International Differences in End-of-Life Attitudes in the Intensive Care Unit
Results of a Survey
Arino Yaguchi, MD;
Robert D. Truog, MD;
J. Randall Curtis, MD;
John M. Luce, MD;
Mitchell M. Levy, MD;
Christian Mélot, MD;
Jean-Louis Vincent, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1970-1975.
Background Important international differences exist in attitudes toward end-of-life issues in the intensive care unit.
Methods A simple questionnaire survey was sent by e-mail to participants at an international meeting on intensive care medicine. Respondents were asked to choose 1 of 3 to 5 possible answers for each of 4 questions related to the treatment of a hypothetical patient in a vegetative state due to anoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest with no family and no advance directives.
Results From 3494 valid addresses, 1961 complete questionnaires (56%) were received from 21 countries. Sixty-two percent of physicians from Northern and Central Europe said they involved nurses in end-of-life discussions compared with only 32% of physicians in Southern Europe, 38% in Brazil, 39% in Japan, and 29% in the United States (P<.001 for all comparisons). Written do-not-resuscitate orders were preferred in Northern and Central Europe, whereas oral orders took preference in Southern Europe, Turkey, and Brazil. One third of Japanese physicians said that they would not apply do-not-resuscitate orders. Most participants from Japan, Turkey, the United States, Southern Europe, and Brazil chose to treat the hypothetical patient with antibiotics if he/she developed septic shock, whereas in Northern Europe, Central Europe, Canada, and Australia, terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and extubation were the more commonly chosen responses.
Conclusions In countries where intensive care medicine is relatively well developed, considerable differences remain in physicians’ attitudes toward end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Substantial work remains if an international consensus on these issues is to be reached.
Author Affiliations: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (Drs Yaguchi, Mélot, and Vincent); Department of Anesthesia and Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (Dr Truog); Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle (Dr Curtis); Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Luce); and Department of Critical Care, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence (Dr Levy).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Leading the Elephant Out of the Corner: The Future of Health Care: Presidential Address at the American Heart Association 2006 Scientific Sessions
Gibbons
Circulation 2007;115:2221-2230.
FULL TEXT
Burnout Syndrome in Critical Care Nursing Staff
Poncet et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:698-704.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
