You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 17, September 26, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Urology
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen on Health-Related Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women With Hysterectomy

Results From the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trial

Robert L. Brunner, PhD; Margery Gass, MD; Aaron Aragaki, MS; Jennifer Hays, PhD; Iris Granek, MD; Nancy Woods, PhD, RN; Ellen Mason, MD; Robert Brzyski, MD, PhD; Judith Ockene, PhD; Annlouise Assaf, PhD; Andrea LaCroix, MPH, PhD; Karen Matthews, PhD; Robert Wallace, MD; for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1976-1986.

Background  The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial of conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs), involving 10 739 postmenopausal women with hysterectomy, aged 50 to 79 years, was stopped early owing to lack of overall health benefit and increased risk of stroke. Because CEE is still prescribed for treatment of menopausal symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis, it is important to understand the overall impact of this therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods  All participants completed 6 specific measures of quality of life at baseline and 1 year, and a subsample (n = 1189) also completed the questions 3 years after randomization. Changes in scores were analyzed for treatment effect.

Results  Randomization to CEE was associated with a statistically significant but small reduction in sleep disturbance at year 1 compared with baseline (mean benefit, 0.4 points on a 20-point scale) and a statistically significant but small negative effect on social functioning (mean effect, –1.3 points on a 100-point scale). There were no significant improvements due to CEE in the areas of general health, physical functioning, pain, vitality, role functioning, mental health, depressive symptoms, cognitive function, or sexual satisfaction at year 1. A subgroup examined 3 years after baseline had no significant benefits for any HRQOL outcomes. Among women aged 50 to 54 years with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at baseline, CEE did not improve any of the HRQOL variables at year 1.

Conclusion  In this trial of postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy, oral CEE did not have a clinically meaningful effect on HRQOL.


Author Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno (Dr Brunner); Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Gass); Clinical Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Mr Aragaki and Dr LaCroix), and University of Washington School of Nursing, Center for Women’s Health Research (Dr Woods), Seattle; Women’s Health Center, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (Dr Hays); Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook (Dr Granek); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Ill (Dr Mason); Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio (Dr Brzyski); Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Ockene); Department of Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI (Dr Assaf); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Matthews); and Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Wallace).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health related quality of life after combined hormone replacement therapy: randomised controlled trial
Welton et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a1190-a1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estrous cycle, pregnancy, and parity enhance performance of rats in object recognition or object placement tasks
Paris and Frye
Reproduction 2008;136:105-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hormone Therapy, Dilemmas, Medical Decisions.
Schulkin
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:73-88.
 

Brain Infusion of Lipopolysaccharide Increases Uterine Growth as a Function of Estrogen Replacement Regimen: Suppression of Uterine Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} by Constant, But Not Pulsed, Estrogen Replacement
Marriott et al.
Endocrinology 2007;148:232-240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of ultra-low-dose transdermal estradiol on cognition and health-related quality of life.
Yaffe et al.
Arch Neurol 2006;63:945-950.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oestrogen did not improve health related quality of life in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy
Johnson
Evid. Based Med. 2006;11:76-76.
FULL TEXT  

Oestrogen does not improve quality of life for postmenopausal women after hysterectomy
BMJ 2005;331:.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of Estrogen on Health-Related Quality of Life
JWatch General 2005;2005:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.