You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 18, October 10, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Sex and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction

A Cohort Study Among Members of a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System in Northern California

Carlos Iribarren, MD, MPH, PhD; Irina Tolstykh, MS; Carol P. Somkin, PhD; Lynn M. Ackerson, PhD; Timothy T. Brown, PhD; Richard Scheffler, PhD; Leonard Syme, PhD; Ichiro Kawachi, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2105-2113.

Background  Previous studies have documented sex and racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the explanation of these disparities remains limited. In a setting that controls for access to medical care, we evaluated whether sex and racial/ethnic disparities in prognosis after AMI persist after consideration of socioeconomic background, personal medical history, and medical management.

Methods  We conducted a prospective cohort study of the members (20 263 men and 10 061 women) of an integrated health care delivery system in northern California who had experienced an AMI between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2002, and were followed up for a median of 3.5 years (maximum, 8 years). Main outcome measures included AMI recurrence and all-cause mortality.

Results  In age-adjusted analyses relative to white men, black men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.65), black women (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.72), and Asian women (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.65) were at increased risk of AMI recurrence. However, multivariate adjustment for sociodemographic background, comorbidities, medication use, angiography, and revascularization procedures effectively removed the excess risk of AMI recurrence in these 3 groups. Similarly, the increased age-adjusted risk of all-cause mortality seen in black men (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.37-1.75) and black women (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-1.66) was greatly attenuated in black men and reversed in black women after full multivariate adjustment.

Conclusion  In a population with equal access to medical care, comprehensive consideration of social, personal, and medical factors could explain sex and racial/ethnic disparities in prognosis after AMI.


Author Affiliations: Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, Calif (Drs Iribarren, Somkin, and Ackerson and Ms Tolstykh); Nicholas C. Petris Center on Health Care Markets and Consumer Welfare (Drs Brown and Scheffler) and School of Public Health (Dr Syme), University of California, Berkeley; and Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Kawachi).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors Associated With Racial Differences in Myocardial Infarction Outcomes
Spertus et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:314-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Patients' Race on Provider Treatment Choices in Coronary Care: A Literature Review for Model Development
Greene Jackson et al.
Policy Politics Nursing Practice 2009;10:40-63.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.