 |
|
Disparities Despite Coverage
Gaps in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Ann S. O’Malley, MD, MPH;
Christopher B. Forrest, MD, PhD;
Shibao Feng, PhD;
Jeanne Mandelblatt, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2129-2135.
Background Despite its effectiveness in reducing mortality, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low, especially among low-income and minority groups; however, physician recommendation can increase screening rates.
Methods We performed a multilevel analysis of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data linked to Medicare claims and the Area Resource File to identify determinants of racial and socioeconomic disparities in CRC screening among 9985 Medicare Parts A and B beneficiaries with a usual physician. Recent CRC screening was defined as receipt of either a home fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy at recommended intervals.
Results Unadjusted rates of screening were 48% for white and 39% for black beneficiaries (P<.001). Racial differences in CRC screening receipt were eliminated after adjustment for socioeconomic status as measured by income and education. Socioeconomic status disparities decreased but remained significant after adjustment for personal and health system factors. Awareness of CRC (adjusted odds ratio, 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 2.29-3.33) and having a primary care generalist (vs another specialist) as one's usual physician (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.53) were associated with higher odds of screening, controlling for other factors. The odds of screening were also higher among those whose usual physician was rated more highly on information-giving skills.
Conclusions Racial differences in CRC screening rates among Medicare beneficiaries with a usual physician are explained by differences in socioeconomic status. Beneficiaries with a primary care generalist as their usual physician had higher rates of CRC screening receipt. Increased efforts to make Medicare beneficiaries aware of the benefits of CRC screening may capitalize on the associations found in this study between CRC knowledge, physician information giving, and timely screening.
Author Affiliations: Cancer Control Program (Drs O’Malley and Mandelblatt) and Department of Biostatistics (Dr Feng), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC (Dr O’Malley); and Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md (Dr Forrest).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Determinants of Racial/Ethnic Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities
Jerant et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1317-1324.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tackling inequalities in health: evaluating the New Deal for Communities initiative
Stafford et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008;62:298-304.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Primary Care Patient Visits on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Preventive Care in the United States
Fiscella and Holt
J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:587-597.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
How to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Practice
Sarfaty and Wender
CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:354-366.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Translation of an Efficacious Cancer-Screening Intervention to Women Enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care Organization
Dietrich et al.
Ann Fam Med 2007;5:320-327.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Disparities in Colon Cancer Presentation and In-Hospital Mortality in Maryland: A Ten-Year Review
Ahuja et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:411-416.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of a Mailed Brochure on Appointment-Keeping for Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial
Denberg et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:895-900.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Colon cancer screening: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Roy et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2177-2179.
FULL TEXT
|
